» Articles » PMID: 12697066

Neural Network Analysis of Lymphoma Microarray Data: Prognosis and Diagnosis Near-perfect

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Biology
Date 2003 Apr 17
PMID 12697066
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Microarray chips are being rapidly deployed as a major tool in genomic research. To date most of the analysis of the enormous amount of information provided on these chips has relied on clustering techniques and other standard statistical procedures. These methods, particularly with regard to cancer patient prognosis, have generally been inadequate in providing the reduced gene subsets required for perfect classification.

Results: Networks trained on microarray data from DLBCL lymphoma patients have, for the first time, been able to predict the long-term survival of individual patients with 100% accuracy. Other networks were able to distinguish DLBCL lymphoma donors from other donors, including donors with other lymphomas, with 99% accuracy. Differentiating the trained network can narrow the gene profile to less than three dozen genes for each classification.

Conclusions: Here we show that artificial neural networks are a superior tool for digesting microarray data both with regard to making distinctions based on the data and with regard to providing very specific reference as to which genes were most important in making the correct distinction in each case.

Citing Articles

CXADR promote epithelial-mesenchymal transition in endometriosis by modulating AKT/GSK-3β signaling.

Tan H, Deng Z, Zhang C, Deng H, Xiao H Cell Cycle. 2023; 22(21-22):2436-2448.

PMID: 38146657 PMC: 10802198. DOI: 10.1080/15384101.2023.2296242.


Iterated cross validation method for prediction of survival in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma for small size dataset.

Chang C, Chen C, Hsieh J, Jeng J Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):1438.

PMID: 36697456 PMC: 9876907. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-28394-6.


Trends and patterns in cancer nanotechnology research: A survey of NCI's caNanoLab and nanotechnology characterization laboratory.

Ke W, Crist R, Clogston J, Stern S, Dobrovolskaia M, Grodzinski P Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2022; 191:114591.

PMID: 36332724 PMC: 9712232. DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2022.114591.


Clinical application of modified bag-of-features coupled with hybrid neural-based classifier in dengue fever classification using gene expression data.

Chatterjee S, Dey N, Shi F, Ashour A, Fong S, Sen S Med Biol Eng Comput. 2017; 56(4):709-720.

PMID: 28891000 DOI: 10.1007/s11517-017-1722-y.


Improving the Prediction of Survival in Cancer Patients by Using Machine Learning Techniques: Experience of Gene Expression Data: A Narrative Review.

Bashiri A, Ghazisaeedi M, Safdari R, Shahmoradi L, Ehtesham H Iran J Public Health. 2017; 46(2):165-172.

PMID: 28451550 PMC: 5402773.


References
1.
Alizadeh A, Eisen M, Davis R, Ma C, Lossos I, Rosenwald A . Distinct types of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma identified by gene expression profiling. Nature. 2000; 403(6769):503-11. DOI: 10.1038/35000501. View

2.
Perou C, Sorlie T, Eisen M, van de Rijn M, Jeffrey S, Rees C . Molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature. 2000; 406(6797):747-52. DOI: 10.1038/35021093. View

3.
Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Eisen M, Alizadeh A, Levy R, Staudt L . 'Gene shaving' as a method for identifying distinct sets of genes with similar expression patterns. Genome Biol. 2001; 1(2):RESEARCH0003. PMC: 15015. DOI: 10.1186/gb-2000-1-2-research0003. View

4.
Khan J, Wei J, Ringner M, Saal L, Ladanyi M, Westermann F . Classification and diagnostic prediction of cancers using gene expression profiling and artificial neural networks. Nat Med. 2001; 7(6):673-9. PMC: 1282521. DOI: 10.1038/89044. View

5.
Dhanasekaran S, Barrette T, Ghosh D, Shah R, Varambally S, Kurachi K . Delineation of prognostic biomarkers in prostate cancer. Nature. 2001; 412(6849):822-6. DOI: 10.1038/35090585. View