» Articles » PMID: 12697051

Design of Phase II Cancer Trials Evaluating Survival Probabilities

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2003 Apr 17
PMID 12697051
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Phase II cancer studies are undertaken to assess the activity of a new drug or a new treatment regimen. Activity is sometimes defined in terms of a survival probability, a binary outcome such as one-year survival that is derived from a time-to-event variable. Phase II studies are usually designed with an interim analysis so they can be stopped if early results are disappointing. Most designs that allow for an interim look are not appropriate for monitoring survival probabilities since many patients will not have enough follow-up by the time of the interim analysis, thus necessitating an inconvenient suspension of accrual while patients are being followed.

Methods: Two-stage phase II clinical trial designs are developed for evaluating survival probabilities. These designs are compared to fixed sample designs and to existing designs developed to monitor binomial probabilities to illustrate the expected reduction in sample size or study length possible with the use of the proposed designs.

Results: Savings can be realized in both the duration of accrual and the total study length, with the expected savings increasing as the accrual rate decreases. Misspecifying the underlying survival distribution and the accrual rate during the planning phase can adversely influence the operating characteristics of the designs.

Conclusion: Two-stage phase II trials for assessing survival probabilities can be designed that do not require prolonged suspension of patient accrual. These designs are more efficient than single stage designs and more practical than existing two-stage designs developed for binomial outcomes, particularly in trials with slow accrual.

Citing Articles

The Win Ratio Approach in Bayesian Monitoring for Two-Arm Phase II Clinical Trial Designs With Multiple Time-To-Event Endpoints.

Huang X, Wang J, Ning J Stat Med. 2024; 43(30):5922-5934.

PMID: 39582325 PMC: 11645213. DOI: 10.1002/sim.10282.


Sample size determination and evaluation for two-stage adaptive designs of single arm clinical trials based on median event time test.

Park Y, Chen Y Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2023; 36:101225.

PMID: 37941851 PMC: 10628339. DOI: 10.1016/j.conctc.2023.101225.


Results of the SEL-I-METRY Phase II Trial on Resensitization of Advanced Iodine Refractory Differentiated Thyroid Cancer to Radioiodine Therapy.

Wadsley J, Ainsworth G, Coulson A, Garcez K, Moss L, Newbold K Thyroid. 2023; 33(9):1119-1123.

PMID: 37565288 PMC: 10516223. DOI: 10.1089/thy.2022.0707.


Bayesian single-arm phase II trial designs with time-to-event endpoints.

Wu J, Pan H, Hsu C Pharm Stat. 2021; 20(6):1235-1248.

PMID: 34085764 PMC: 9502026. DOI: 10.1002/pst.2143.


Optimal two-stage design of single arm Phase II clinical trials based on median event time test.

Park Y PLoS One. 2021; 16(2):e0246448.

PMID: 33556130 PMC: 7870013. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246448.


References
1.
Case L, Morgan T . Duration of accrual and follow-up for two-stage clinical trials. Lifetime Data Anal. 2001; 7(1):21-37. DOI: 10.1023/a:1009621009283. View

2.
Chang M, Therneau T, Wieand H, Cha S . Designs for group sequential phase II clinical trials. Biometrics. 1987; 43(4):865-74. View

3.
Green S, Dahlberg S . Planned versus attained design in phase II clinical trials. Stat Med. 1992; 11(7):853-62. DOI: 10.1002/sim.4780110703. View

4.
Thall P, Simon R . Practical Bayesian guidelines for phase IIB clinical trials. Biometrics. 1994; 50(2):337-49. View

5.
Casper E, Green M, Kelsen D, Heelan R, Brown T, Flombaum C . Phase II trial of gemcitabine (2,2'-difluorodeoxycytidine) in patients with adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Invest New Drugs. 1994; 12(1):29-34. DOI: 10.1007/BF00873232. View