» Articles » PMID: 12696986

Pharmaceutical Care Programmes for the Elderly: Economic Issues

Overview
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 2003 Apr 17
PMID 12696986
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Pharmaceutical care is defined as the responsible provision of drug therapy for the purpose of achieving definite outcomes that improve a patient's quality of life. It describes the process through which a pharmacist collaborates with a patient and with healthcare professionals in designing, implementing and monitoring a therapeutic plan that will produce specific, desirable therapeutic outcomes for the patient. The elderly are a patient population who could particularly benefit from pharmaceutical care provision as they are at greater risk of experiencing significant drug-related problems such as inappropriate prescribing, noncompliance with prescribed medication and adverse drug reactions/interactions leading to a decrease in health-related quality of life. The extent of economic benefit of pharmaceutical care reported in the literature is variable and its generalisability is suspect due to the lack of trials which have utilised a robust research design. The few studies which have undertaken a rigourous economic evaluation have used a range of data collection methods that is reflective of the difficulty of capturing essential data. Furthermore, even in well-designed studies, the generalisability of economic evaluations to other countries is questionable because of unique national data collection systems and an inability to pool international data because of disparities between different healthcare systems. The use of a suitable measure for health-related quality of life is also problematic in a very diverse and heterogeneous population such as the elderly and, therefore, adds to the difficulties of inclusion of such measures in economic analyses of pharmaceutical care programmes. A more standardised approach to data collection is required to facilitate economic analyses as an essential element in the evaluation of any pharmaceutical care programme for the elderly. Suggestions on such approaches, together with a critical appraisal of studies performed to date, are the focus of this review.

Citing Articles

Strategies to Improve Therapeutic Adherence in Polymedicated Patients over 65 Years: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Burgos-Alonso N, Torrecilla M, Mendiguren A, Perez-Gomez Moreta M, Bruzos-Cidon C Pharmacy (Basel). 2024; 12(1).

PMID: 38392942 PMC: 10892390. DOI: 10.3390/pharmacy12010035.


A bibliometric analysis of global trends in the research field of pharmaceutical care over the past 20 years.

Wang Y, Rao Y, Yin Y, Li Y, Lin Z, Zhang B Front Public Health. 2022; 10:980866.

PMID: 36324463 PMC: 9618714. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.980866.


Identifying Potential Drug-Related Problems Among Geriatric Patients With Use of an Integrated Clinical Decision Support Tool.

Bobrova V, Fialova D, Desselle S, Heinamaki J, Volmer D Front Pharmacol. 2022; 13:761787.

PMID: 35418859 PMC: 8995559. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.761787.


Cost-utility analysis of a medication review with follow-up service for older adults with polypharmacy in community pharmacies in Spain: the conSIGUE program.

Jodar-Sanchez F, Malet-Larrea A, Martin J, Garcia-Mochon L, Lopez Del Amo M, Martinez-Martinez F Pharmacoeconomics. 2015; 33(6):599-610.

PMID: 25774017 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-015-0270-2.


Economic evaluation of end stage renal disease patients undergoing hemodialysis.

Suja A, Anju R, Anju V, Neethu J, Peeyush P, Saraswathy R J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2012; 4(2):107-11.

PMID: 22557920 PMC: 3341713. DOI: 10.4103/0975-7406.94810.


References
1.
Hanlon J, Weinberger M, Samsa G, Schmader K, Uttech K, Lewis I . A randomized, controlled trial of a clinical pharmacist intervention to improve inappropriate prescribing in elderly outpatients with polypharmacy. Am J Med. 1996; 100(4):428-37. DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9343(97)89519-8. View

2.
Posey L . Pharmaceutical care: will pharmacy incorporate its philosophy of practice?. J Am Pharm Assoc (Wash). 1997; NS37(2):145-8. DOI: 10.1016/s1086-5802(16)30201-7. View

3.
Meade V . Conducting at-home medication reviews. Am Pharm. 1992; NS32(6):37-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0160-3450(15)31093-x. View

4.
Westerlund T, Almarsdottir A, Melander A . Factors influencing the detection rate of drug-related problems in community pharmacy. Pharm World Sci. 2000; 21(6):245-50. DOI: 10.1023/a:1008767406692. View

5.
Brazier J . The Short-Form 36 (SF-36) Health Survey and its use in pharmacoeconomic evaluation. Pharmacoeconomics. 1995; 7(5):403-15. DOI: 10.2165/00019053-199507050-00005. View