» Articles » PMID: 12694833

Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: Dosimetric Advantage over Conventional Plans and Feasibility of Dose Escalation

Overview
Specialties Oncology
Radiology
Date 2003 Apr 16
PMID 12694833
Citations 94
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To compare intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with two-dimensional RT (2D-RT) and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) treatment plans in different stages of nasopharyngeal carcinoma and to explore the feasibility of dose escalation in locally advanced disease.

Materials And Methods: Three patients with different stages (T1N0M0, T2bN2M0 with retrostyloid extension, and T4N2M0) were selected, and 2D-RT, 3D-CRT, and IMRT treatment plans (66 Gy) were made for each of them and compared with respect to target coverage, normal tissue sparing, and tumor control probability/normal tissue complication probability values. In the Stage T2b and T4 patients, the IMRT 66-Gy plan was combined with a 3D-CRT 14-Gy boost plan using a 3-mm micromultileaf collimator, and the dose-volume histograms of the summed plans were compared with their corresponding 66-Gy 2D-RT plans.

Results: In the dosimetric comparison of 2D-RT, 3D-CRT, and IMRT treatment plans, the T1N0M0 patient had better sparing of the parotid glands and temporomandibular joints with IMRT (dose to 50% parotid volume, 57 Gy, 50 Gy, and 31 Gy, respectively). In the T2bN2M0 patient, the dose to 95% volume of the planning target volume improved from 57.5 Gy in 2D-RT to 64.8 Gy in 3D-CRT and 68 Gy in IMRT. In the T4N2M0 patient, improvement in both target coverage and brainstem/temporal lobe sparing was seen with IMRT planning. In the dose-escalation study for locally advanced disease, IMRT 66 Gy plus 14 Gy 3D-CRT boost achieved an improvement in the therapeutic ratio by delivering a higher dose to the target while keeping the normal organs below the maximal tolerance dose.

Conclusions: IMRT is useful in treating all stages of nonmetastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma because of its dosimetric advantages. In early-stage disease, it provides better parotid gland sparing. In locally advanced disease, IMRT offers better tumor coverage and normal organ sparing and allows room for dose escalation.

Citing Articles

Neck muscle training improving the setup of reproducibility in patient with head and neck cancer receiving radiotherapy - a prospective randomized controlled study.

Bai F, Zhang L, Yao X, Li B, Li J, Hu Q Radiat Oncol. 2025; 20(1):35.

PMID: 40075387 PMC: 11905638. DOI: 10.1186/s13014-025-02593-z.


Case Reports: A role of postoperative radiation therapy in completely resected early stage intrathyroid thymic carcinoma: a case report and literature review of the diagnosis and treatment.

Cui A, Du Y, Hou C, Zhang L, Sun L, He H Front Oncol. 2023; 13:1234961.

PMID: 37849817 PMC: 10577444. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1234961.


Effect of radiotherapy interruption on nasopharyngeal cancer.

Zhao F, Yang D, Li X Front Oncol. 2023; 13:1114652.

PMID: 37091186 PMC: 10116059. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1114652.


Predicting gamma evaluation results of patient-specific head and neck volumetric-modulated arc therapy quality assurance based on multileaf collimator patterns and fluence map features: A feasibility study.

Thongsawad S, Srisatit S, Fuangrod T J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2022; 23(7):e13622.

PMID: 35584035 PMC: 9278677. DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13622.


Long-term outcomes of nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients with T1-2 stage in intensity-modulated radiotherapy era.

Niu X, Xue F, Liu P, Hu C, He X Int J Med Sci. 2022; 19(2):267-273.

PMID: 35165512 PMC: 8795811. DOI: 10.7150/ijms.68394.