» Articles » PMID: 12681451

Management of Acute Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures: a Nonrandomized Trial Comparing Percutaneous Vertebroplasty with Conservative Therapy

Overview
Journal Am J Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2003 Apr 12
PMID 12681451
Citations 101
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: We sought to determine whether percutaneous vertebroplasty--which involves the injection of cement to stabilize a fractured vertebral body--may be an effective treatment for vertebral fracture.

Methods: We enrolled 79 consecutive osteoporotic patients (24 men and 55 women; ages 51 to 93 years) presenting with acute vertebral fractures. Clinical characteristics and bone densitometry were measured at baseline. Pain scores (on a 0 to 25 scale) and levels of function (on a 0 to 20 scale) were recorded on presentation, at 24 hours, at 6 weeks, and 6 to 12 months after therapy.

Results: Fifty-five patients (70%) were treated by percutaneous vertebroplasty and 24 (30%) were treated by conservative therapy alone. They were followed for a mean of 215 days (range, 57 to 399 days). The baseline clinical characteristics, bone densitometry, and fracture data were similar in the two groups. Twenty-four hours after vertebroplasty, there was a 53% reduction in pain scores (from 19 to 9; P = 0.0001) and a 29% improvement in physical functioning (from 14 to 18; P = 0.0001), whereas pain scores and physical functioning remained unchanged at 24 hours in the patients treated conservatively (both P = 0.0001 compared with the changes after percutaneous vertebroplasty). Thirteen patients (24%) treated by percutaneous vertebroplasty were able to cease all analgesia after 24 hours (P = 0.0001 compared with none of the 24 patients treated conservatively). Clinical outcomes at 6 weeks and 6 to 12 months were similar in both groups.

Conclusion: When compared with conservative therapy, percutaneous vertebroplasty results in prompt pain relief and rapid rehabilitation. In experienced hands, it is a safe and effective procedure for treating acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.

Citing Articles

Risk factors for nonunion of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture: a case‒control study.

Liao S, Xu Y, Liu J, Jiang L, Dai G, Wang Y BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024; 25(1):295.

PMID: 38627756 PMC: 11020417. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-07386-1.


Percutaneous vertebroplasty versus percutaneous kyphoplasty in elderly patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: prospective controlled study.

Wang Q, Liu J, Ji Q, Qiu Y, Min N, Wang L BJS Open. 2024; 8(1).

PMID: 38284400 PMC: 10823769. DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrad162.


Early Vertebroplasty for Severely Painful Acute Osteoporotic Compression Fractures: A Critical Review of the Literature.

Clark W, Diamond T Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2023; 46(11):1439-1446.

PMID: 36656324 PMC: 10616218. DOI: 10.1007/s00270-022-03348-z.


The Rates of Cement Leakage Following Vertebroplasty in Osteoporotic versus Metastatic Disease.

Saad A, Botchu R, James S Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2022; 32(1):46-50.

PMID: 35722636 PMC: 9200480. DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1744122.


Difference in the Cobb Angle Between Standing and Supine Position as a Prognostic Factor After Vertebral Augmentation in Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures.

Bae I, Moon B, Kang H, Kim J, Jwa C, Kim D Neurospine. 2022; 19(2):357-366.

PMID: 35588761 PMC: 9260559. DOI: 10.14245/ns.2143172.586.