» Articles » PMID: 12679505

Quality Indicators for Primary Care Mental Health Services

Overview
Specialty Health Services
Date 2003 Apr 8
PMID 12679505
Citations 33
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To identify a generic set of face valid quality indicators for primary care mental health services which reflect a multi-stakeholder perspective and can be used for facilitating quality improvement.

Design: Modified two-round postal Delphi questionnaire.

Setting: Geographical spread across Great Britain.

Participants: One hundred and fifteen panellists representing 11 different stakeholder groups within primary care mental health services (clinical psychologist, health and social care commissioner, community psychiatric nurse, counsellor, general practitioner, practice nurse/district nurse/health visitor, psychiatrist, social worker, carer, patient and voluntary organisations).

Main Outcome Measures: Face validity (median rating of 8 or 9 on a nine point scale with agreement by all panels) for assessing quality of care.

Results: A maximum of 334 indicators were rated by panels in the second round; 26% were rated valid by all panels. These indicators were categorised into 21 aspects of care, 11 relating to general practices and 10 relating to health authorities or primary care groups/trusts. There was variation in the total number of indicators rated valid across the different panels. Overall, GPs rated the lowest number of indicators as valid (41%, n=138) and carers rated the highest number valid (91%, n=304).

Conclusions: The quality indicators represent consensus among key stakeholder groups in defining quality of care within primary care mental health services. These indicators could provide a guide for primary care organisations embarking on quality improvement initiatives in mental health care when addressing national targets and standards relating to primary care set out in the National Service Framework for Mental Health for England. Although many of the indicators relate to parochial issues in UK service delivery, the methodology used in the development of the indicators could be applied in other settings to produce locally relevant indicators.

Citing Articles

Developing a quality and safety assessment framework for Iran's military hospitals.

Markazi-Moghaddam N, Mohammadimehr M, Nikoomanesh M, Rezapour R, Jame S BMC Health Serv Res. 2024; 24(1):775.

PMID: 38956535 PMC: 11218077. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-11248-w.


Primary mental healthcare for older people in India: between stigmatization and community orientation.

Kafczyk T, Hamel K Discov Ment Health. 2023; 3(1):14.

PMID: 37861873 PMC: 10501019. DOI: 10.1007/s44192-023-00040-7.


Developing and Testing an Evaluation Framework for Collaborative Mental Health Services in Primary Care Systems in Latin America.

Sapag J, Mancevski A, Perry A, Norman C, Barnsley J, Ferris L Community Ment Health J. 2023; 60(3):426-437.

PMID: 37815700 DOI: 10.1007/s10597-023-01186-y.


Global core indicators for measuring WHO's paediatric quality-of-care standards in health facilities: development and expert consensus.

Muzigaba M, Chitashvili T, Choudhury A, Were W, Diaz T, Strong K BMC Health Serv Res. 2022; 22(1):887.

PMID: 35804384 PMC: 9270792. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-08234-5.


Developing an App to Screen for Dual Disorders: A Tool for Improving Treatment Services in Mexico.

Marin-Navarrete R, Torrens M, Toledo-Fernandez A, Mestre-Pinto J, Sanchez-Dominguez R, Perez-Lopez A Front Psychiatry. 2021; 12:697598.

PMID: 34777035 PMC: 8585995. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.697598.


References
1.
Wilkinson G, Williams P . Priorities for research on mental health in primary care settings. Psychol Med. 1985; 15(3):507-14. DOI: 10.1017/s0033291700031378. View

2.
Kassirer J . The quality of care and the quality of measuring it. N Engl J Med. 1993; 329(17):1263-5. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199310213291710. View

3.
Turpin R, Darcy L, Koss R, McMahill C, Meyne K, Morton D . A model to assess the usefulness of performance indicators. Int J Qual Health Care. 1996; 8(4):321-9. DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/8.4.321. View

4.
Schaller G, Fournier P . [Prevention priorities in mental health in Geneva: a study using the Delphi technic]. Sante Publique. 1998; 10(2):191-201. View

5.
Fiander M, Burns T . Essential components of schizophrenia care: a Delphi approach. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1998; 98(5):400-5. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1998.tb10105.x. View