Evaluation of a Small Cadmium Zinc Telluride Detector for Scintimammography
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Unlabelled: The purpose of this study was to evaluate a small semiconductor-based gamma camera that may have applications in scintimammography.
Methods: A small cadmium zinc telluride (CZT) detector was evaluated. The detector had a field of view of 20 x 20 cm with detector elements of 2.5 x 2.5 mm in size. Both short-bore (35 mm) and long-bore (50 mm) collimators, matched to the geometry of the detector elements, were evaluated. The imaging performance of the CZT detector was compared with that of a conventional gamma camera equipped with all-purpose and ultra-high-resolution collimators. The performance of both systems with respect to breast imaging was evaluated using a water tank containing small glass spheres, 1.8-9.8 mm in diameter. The effects of variations in breast thickness, tumor depth, and tumor-to-background ratio were all simulated in this phantom model. Total counts per image were adjusted to approximate the count density observed in clinical scintimammographic studies.
Results: Sensitivity of the CZT detector was 76% that of the equivalent NaI system. The system demonstrated excellent integral uniformity. The energy resolution of the CZT system was 6.5% for (99m)Tc. Spatial resolution with the long-bore collimator was superior to that of a conventional large field-of -view gamma camera equipped with an ultra-high- resolution collimator, over the range 0-6 cm from the collimator face. A blinded review of breast phantom images showed that small spheres (< or =7 mm in diameter) were better seen and had a better tumor-to-background ratio with the CZT system than with the conventional gamma camera.
Conclusion: A small CZT detector offers superior performance to a conventional gamma camera and should permit reliable detection of breast tumors <1 cm in size.
Radiation Detectors and Sensors in Medical Imaging.
Michail C, Liaparinos P, Kalyvas N, Kandarakis I, Fountos G, Valais I Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(19).
PMID: 39409289 PMC: 11478476. DOI: 10.3390/s24196251.
Izawa D, Ito T, Sanada H, Oku T, Nakamoto A, Hiraki H Radiol Phys Technol. 2023; 16(4):569-577.
PMID: 37804463 DOI: 10.1007/s12194-023-00746-x.
Ito T, Matsusaka Y, Onoguchi M, Ichikawa H, Okuda K, Shibutani T J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2021; 22(2):165-177.
PMID: 33426812 PMC: 7882118. DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13158.
Campbell D, Peterson T IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci. 2017; 1(5):405-415.
PMID: 28989990 PMC: 5629019. DOI: 10.1109/TRPMS.2017.2725310.
Mann S, Tornai M J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2016; 2(3):033504.
PMID: 26839906 PMC: 4729114. DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.2.3.033504.