» Articles » PMID: 12663640

How Morphometric Analysis of Metastatic Load Predicts the (un)usefulness of PET Scanning: the Case of Lymph Node Staging in Melanoma

Overview
Journal J Clin Pathol
Specialty Pathology
Date 2003 Mar 29
PMID 12663640
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: In primary cutaneous melanoma, the sentinel node (SN) biopsy is an accurate method for the staging of the lymph nodes. Positron emission tomography (PET) has been suggested as a useful alternative. However, the sensitivity of PET may be too low to detect SN metastases, which are often small.

Aim: To predict the value of PET for initial lymph node staging in melanoma based on morphometric analysis of SN metastatic load, without exposing patients to PET.

Materials And Methods: In 59 SN positive patients with melanoma, the sizes of tumour deposits in the SNs and subsequent dissection specimens were measured by morphometry and correlated with the detection limits of current and future PET scanners.

Results: The median tumour volume within the basin was 0.15 mm(3) (range, 0.0001-118.86). Seventy per cent of these deposits were smaller than 1 mm(3). State of the art PET scanners that have a resolution of about 5 mm would detect only 15-49% of positive basins. Logistic regression analysis revealed no pretest indicators identifying patients expected to have a positive PET. However, the SN tumour load was a significant and single predictor of the presence of PET detectable residual tumour.

Conclusion: Morphometric analysis of metastatic load predicts that PET scanning is unable to detect most metastatic deposits in sentinel lymph nodes of patients with melanoma because the metastases are often small. Therefore, the SN biopsy remains the preferred method for initial regional staging.

Citing Articles

Preoperative FDG-PET/CT Is an Important Tool in the Management of Patients with Thick (T4) Melanoma.

Arrangoiz R, Papavasiliou P, Stransky C, Yu J, Tianyu L, Sigurdson E Dermatol Res Pract. 2012; 2012:614349.

PMID: 22654898 PMC: 3359680. DOI: 10.1155/2012/614349.


A review of imaging agent development.

Agdeppa E, Spilker M AAPS J. 2009; 11(2):286-99.

PMID: 19415506 PMC: 2691464. DOI: 10.1208/s12248-009-9104-5.


Direct comparison of [18F]FDG PET/CT with PET alone and with side-by-side PET and CT in patients with malignant melanoma.

Mottaghy F, Sunderkotter C, Schubert R, Wohlfart P, Blumstein N, Neumaier B Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2007; 34(9):1355-64.

PMID: 17295038 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-006-0358-1.


Positron emission tomography using [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG-PET) in the clinically negative neck: is it likely to be superior?.

Brouwer J, de Bree R, Comans E, Castelijns J, Hoekstra O, Leemans C Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2003; 261(9):479-83.

PMID: 14685887 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-003-0727-3.

References
1.
Acland K, Healy C, Calonje E, ODoherty M, Nunan T, Page C . Comparison of positron emission tomography scanning and sentinel node biopsy in the detection of micrometastases of primary cutaneous malignant melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2001; 19(10):2674-8. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.10.2674. View

2.
Greco M, Crippa F, Agresti R, Seregni E, Gerali A, Giovanazzi R . Axillary lymph node staging in breast cancer by 2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose-positron emission tomography: clinical evaluation and alternative management. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001; 93(8):630-5. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/93.8.630. View

3.
Statius Muller M, Van Leeuwen P, van Diest P, Vuylsteke R, Pijpers R, Meijer S . No indication for performing sentinel node biopsy in melanoma patients with a Breslow thickness of less than 0.9 mm. Melanoma Res. 2001; 11(3):303-7. DOI: 10.1097/00008390-200106000-00013. View

4.
Wagner J, Schauwecker D, Davidson D, Wenck S, Jung S, Hutchins G . FDG-PET sensitivity for melanoma lymph node metastases is dependent on tumor volume. J Surg Oncol. 2001; 77(4):237-42. DOI: 10.1002/jso.1102. View

5.
Torrenga H, Licht J, van der Hoeven J, Hoekstra O, Meijer S, van Diest P . Re: Axillary lymph node staging in breast cancer by 2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose-positron emission tomography: clinical evaluation and alternative management. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001; 93(21):1659-61. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/93.21.1659. View