» Articles » PMID: 12653891

Comparison of Doppler Ultrasonography and the Hepatic Venous Pressure Gradient in Assessing Portal Hypertension in Liver Cirrhosis

Overview
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2003 Mar 26
PMID 12653891
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Aim: This prospective study aimed to determine whether Doppler ultrasonography can represent the hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) as an assessment of the severity of portal hypertension and the response to terlipressin, which reduces the portal pressure in liver cirrhosis.

Methods: The HVPG and the Doppler ultrasonographic parameters, such as the portal venous velocity and the splenic venous velocity, the pulsatility and the resistive index of the hepatic, splenic and renal arteries were measured in 138 patients with liver cirrhosis. The changes in the HVPG and the portal venous velocity after administering terlipressin were evaluated in 43 of the 138 patients. The patients who showed a reduction in the HVPG of more than 20% of the baseline were defined as responders to terlipressin.

Results: None of the Doppler ultrasonographic parameters correlated with the HVPG. Both the HVPG (28.0 +/- 19.8%) and the portal venous velocity (29.7 +/- 13.2%) showed a significant reduction after terlipressin administration. However, the portal venous velocity decreased significantly, not only in the responders (31.0 +/- 12.0%) but also in the non-responders (25.2 +/- 16.4%).

Conclusions: Doppler ultrasonography does not represent the HVPG, and is therefore not suitable for replacing HVPG as a means of assessing the severity of portal hypertension and the response to drugs which reduce the portal pressure in liver cirrhosis.

Citing Articles

Application of ultrasound for the diagnosis of cirrhosis/portal hypertension.

Han S, Kim M, Kang S, Baik S J Med Ultrason (2001). 2022; 49(3):321-331.

PMID: 35179669 DOI: 10.1007/s10396-022-01191-w.


Diagnosing Portal Hypertension with Noninvasive Subharmonic Pressure Estimates from a US Contrast Agent.

Gupta I, Eisenbrey J, Machado P, Stanczak M, Wessner C, Shaw C Radiology. 2020; 298(1):104-111.

PMID: 33201789 PMC: 7771992. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2020202677.


Portal vein flow velocity as a possible fast noninvasive screening tool for esophageal varices in cirrhotic patients.

Elkenawy Y, Elarabawy R, Ahmed L, Elsawy A JGH Open. 2020; 4(4):589-594.

PMID: 32782943 PMC: 7411658. DOI: 10.1002/jgh3.12301.


Portal pressure monitoring-state-of-the-art and future perspective.

Xu G, Li F, Mao Y Ann Transl Med. 2019; 7(20):583.

PMID: 31807564 PMC: 6861775. DOI: 10.21037/atm.2019.09.22.


Magnetic Resonance Elastography Shear Wave Velocity Correlates with Liver Fibrosis and Hepatic Venous Pressure Gradient in Adults with Advanced Liver Disease.

Gharib A, Han M, Meissner E, Kleiner D, Zhao X, McLaughlin M Biomed Res Int. 2017; 2017:2067479.

PMID: 28480218 PMC: 5396439. DOI: 10.1155/2017/2067479.