Cohabiting and Marriage During Young Men's Career-development Process
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Using recently released cohabitation data for the male sample of the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth, first interviewed in 1979, I conducted multinomial discrete-time event-history analyses of how young men's career-development process affects both the formation and the dissolution of cohabiting unions. For a substantial proportion of young men, cohabitation seemed to represent an adaptive strategy during a period of career immaturity, whereas marriage was a far more likely outcome for both stably employed cohabitors and noncohabitors alike. Earnings positively affected the entry into either a cohabiting or marital union but exhibited a strong threshold effect. Once the men were in cohabiting unions, however, earnings had little effect on the odds of marrying. Men with better long-run socioeconomic prospects were far more likely to marry from either the noncohabiting or cohabiting state, and this was particularly true for blacks.
First Union Formation in Italy: The Role of Micro- and Macro-Level Economic Conditions.
Meggiolaro S, Ongaro F, Pirani E Eur J Popul. 2024; 40(1):31.
PMID: 39485564 PMC: 11530416. DOI: 10.1007/s10680-024-09712-8.
Cohabiting couple's economic organization and marriage patterns across social classes.
McErlean K J Marriage Fam. 2024; 86(3):762-786.
PMID: 38682082 PMC: 11052548. DOI: 10.1111/jomf.12947.
Hsu C, Engelhardt H Eur J Popul. 2024; 40(1):12.
PMID: 38551699 PMC: 10980669. DOI: 10.1007/s10680-024-09698-3.
Pooling of Wealth in Marriage: The Role of Premarital Cohabitation.
Vitali A, Fraboni R Eur J Popul. 2022; 38(4):721-754.
PMID: 36237296 PMC: 9550889. DOI: 10.1007/s10680-022-09627-2.
Shepard M, Betz M, Snyder A Rural Sociol. 2022; 85(3):623-657.
PMID: 35034988 PMC: 8758053. DOI: 10.1111/ruso.12306.