» Articles » PMID: 12647517

Cohabiting and Marriage During Young Men's Career-development Process

Overview
Journal Demography
Specialty Public Health
Date 2003 Mar 22
PMID 12647517
Citations 60
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Using recently released cohabitation data for the male sample of the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth, first interviewed in 1979, I conducted multinomial discrete-time event-history analyses of how young men's career-development process affects both the formation and the dissolution of cohabiting unions. For a substantial proportion of young men, cohabitation seemed to represent an adaptive strategy during a period of career immaturity, whereas marriage was a far more likely outcome for both stably employed cohabitors and noncohabitors alike. Earnings positively affected the entry into either a cohabiting or marital union but exhibited a strong threshold effect. Once the men were in cohabiting unions, however, earnings had little effect on the odds of marrying. Men with better long-run socioeconomic prospects were far more likely to marry from either the noncohabiting or cohabiting state, and this was particularly true for blacks.

Citing Articles

First Union Formation in Italy: The Role of Micro- and Macro-Level Economic Conditions.

Meggiolaro S, Ongaro F, Pirani E Eur J Popul. 2024; 40(1):31.

PMID: 39485564 PMC: 11530416. DOI: 10.1007/s10680-024-09712-8.


Cohabiting couple's economic organization and marriage patterns across social classes.

McErlean K J Marriage Fam. 2024; 86(3):762-786.

PMID: 38682082 PMC: 11052548. DOI: 10.1111/jomf.12947.


A Precarious Path to Partnership? The Moderating Effects of Labour Market Regulations on the Relationship Between Unstable Employment and Union Formation in Europe.

Hsu C, Engelhardt H Eur J Popul. 2024; 40(1):12.

PMID: 38551699 PMC: 10980669. DOI: 10.1007/s10680-024-09698-3.


Pooling of Wealth in Marriage: The Role of Premarital Cohabitation.

Vitali A, Fraboni R Eur J Popul. 2022; 38(4):721-754.

PMID: 36237296 PMC: 9550889. DOI: 10.1007/s10680-022-09627-2.


The Shale Boom and Family Structure: Oil and Gas Employment Growth's Relationship to Marriage, Divorce, and Cohabitation.

Shepard M, Betz M, Snyder A Rural Sociol. 2022; 85(3):623-657.

PMID: 35034988 PMC: 8758053. DOI: 10.1111/ruso.12306.


References
1.
Manning W, Smock P . Why marry? Race and the transition to marriage among cohabitors. Demography. 1995; 32(4):509-20. View

2.
Oppenheimer V, Kalmijn M, Lim N . Men's career development and marriage timing during a period of rising inequality. Demography. 1997; 34(3):311-30. View

3.
Bumpass L, Sweet J . National estimates of cohabitation. Demography. 1989; 26(4):615-25. View

4.
Bumpass L, Lu H . Trends in cohabitation and implications for children s family contexts in the United States. Popul Stud (Camb). 2017; 54(1):29-41. DOI: 10.1080/713779060. View

5.
Moffitt R, Reville R, Winkler A . Beyond single mothers: cohabitation and marriage in the AFDC program. Demography. 1998; 35(3):259-78. View