» Articles » PMID: 12645785

Validation of a New Method of Measuring Esophageal Acid Exposure: Comparison with 24-hour PH Monitoring

Overview
Journal Dig Dis Sci
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2003 Mar 21
PMID 12645785
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Recently, we developed a disposable acid exposure sensor whose in vitro response to acid below pH 4 is linearly determined by the duration of exposure and the degree of acidity. The aim of the present study was to compare the SR to simultaneous esophageal pH and duodenogastroesophageal reflux (DGER) monitoring (Bilitec) in patients investigated for presumed gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Twenty-six patients (16 men, mean age 46 +/- 2 years) with symptoms suggestive of GERD underwent 24-hr ambulatory pH monitoring and SR monitoring at 5 cm proximal to the LES. DGER monitoring was performed in 21 patients. Exposure of the esophagus to acid and to DGER were analyzed. These data were compared to SR. A significant correlation was found between the exposure of the distal esophagus to acid and SR (R = 0.85; P < 0.0001). Similarly, the area below a cutoff pH 4 was significantly correlated to SR (r = 0.81; P < 0.0001). SR was not correlated to DGER (r = 0.16; NS). At a cutoff of 50, the sensitivity and specificity of SR to predict esophageal acid exposure > 5% of time were 91% and 93%, respectively conclusion, the response of the acid exposure sensor is strongly correlated with the results of simultaneous esophageal pH monitoring. The sensor seems able to reliably predict pathological esophageal acid exposure. These findings warrant larger studies of the clinical potential of the acid exposure sensor in the diagnosis and quantification of GERD.

Citing Articles

Management of bile reflux.

Sifrim D Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2013; 9(3):179-80.

PMID: 23961269 PMC: 3745208.

References
1.
Galmiche J, Barthelemy P, Hamelin B . Treating the symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a double-blind comparison of omeprazole and cisapride. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1997; 11(4):765-73. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.1997.00185.x. View

2.
Murphy D, Yuan Y, Castell D . Does the intraesophageal pH probe accurately detect acid reflux? Simultaneous recording with two pH probes in humans. Dig Dis Sci. 1989; 34(5):649-56. DOI: 10.1007/BF01540333. View

3.
VANTRAPPEN G, Tack J, Huyberechts G, Sifrim D, Geboes K, Janmsens J . Studies on the relationship between esophageal acid exposure, mucosal lesions and heartburn using an acid exposure sensor. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2002; 37(11):1253-8. DOI: 10.1080/003655202761020506. View

4.
Klauser A, Heinrich C, Schindlbeck N, Muller-Lissner S . Is long-term esophageal pH monitoring of clinical value?. Am J Gastroenterol. 1989; 84(4):362-6. View

5.
Quigley E . 24-h pH monitoring for gastroesophageal reflux disease: already standard but not yet gold?. Am J Gastroenterol. 1992; 87(9):1071-5. View