» Articles » PMID: 12641697

Evolution of Accommodative Function and Development of Ocular Movements in Children

Overview
Date 2003 Mar 19
PMID 12641697
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The evolution of the accommodative function and development of ocular movement are evaluated in a non-clinical paediatric population (1056 subjects) aged 6-12 years, providing means for each age in the optometric tests that evaluate the accommodative amplitude, accommodative facility, accommodative response (lag), and saccadic movements. A comparison of these values between ages (anova) established three distinct trends in the behaviour of these parameters. The accommodative amplitude, measured by modified dynamic retinoscopy, and the evaluation of the saccadic movements by the development of ocular movements [developmental eye movement (DEM)] test showed continuous change with age. The values for monocular and binocular accommodative facility, measured by +/-2.00 D flippers, indicated the need to divide the population into two age groups (6-7 and 8-12 years). Finally, the means of accommodative response, measured by monocular estimation model (MEM) retinoscopy, and the direct observation of saccadic movement revealed no significant differences between ages, establishing a single mean reference value for the age group studied.

Citing Articles

Developmental eye movement test results of Hebrew-speaking children with cross-linguistic comparisons.

Ben-Eli H, Blique H, Scheiman M, Eichler R Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2024; 45(1):43-49.

PMID: 39462238 PMC: 11629855. DOI: 10.1111/opo.13409.


Associations between Accommodative Facility, Age, and Refractive Errors in Early, Older Adolescent Myopes and Emmetropes.

Ramamurthy D, Radhakrishnan H, Pardhan S Br Ir Orthopt J. 2023; 19(1):15-25.

PMID: 37008825 PMC: 10064887. DOI: 10.22599/bioj.284.


Spotlight on the Developmental Eye Movement (DEM) Test.

Facchin A Clin Optom (Auckl). 2021; 13:73-81.

PMID: 33688290 PMC: 7936383. DOI: 10.2147/OPTO.S232487.


Sources of error in clinical measurement of the amplitude of accommodation.

Burns D, Allen P, Edgar D, Evans B J Optom. 2019; 13(1):3-14.

PMID: 31303551 PMC: 6951837. DOI: 10.1016/j.optom.2019.05.002.


The Reliability of the DEM Test in the Clinical Environment.

Facchin A, Maffioletti S Front Psychol. 2018; 9:1279.

PMID: 30090077 PMC: 6068272. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01279.