Five-test Simple Scheme for Species-level Identification of Clinically Significant Coagulase-negative Staphylococci
Overview
Affiliations
A working scheme developed in our laboratory for identification (by species group and species) of coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS) was evaluated with 201 consecutive isolates and then validated by using the reference method of Kloos and Schleifer (W. E. Kloos and K. H. Schleifer, J. Clin. Microbiol. 1:82-88, 1975). This five-test simple scheme (referred to here as the simple scheme) combines the novobiocin susceptibility test with tests for urease, pyrrolidonyl arylamidase, ornithine decarboxylase, and aerobic acid from mannose. The addition of one or two tests within a particular species group could then positively identify the isolate. Two commercial systems, Staph-Zym (Rosco) and API-Staph (bioMérieux), along with results obtained by using Rosco diagnostic tablets (nongrowth tests), were also compared with the reference method. One isolate could not be identified even by the reference method. Of the remaining 200 strains, 191 (95.5%) strains were correctly identified with Staph-Zym and 171 strains (85.5%) were correctly identified with API-Staph. The most frequent clinical CNS species isolated were Staphylococcus epidermidis (50.5%), S. haemolyticus (18.5%), S. saprophyticus subsp. saprophyticus (16.0%), S. lugdunensis (6.0%), and S. warneri (2.5%). The simple scheme validated with the reference method has demonstrated an excellent correlation in the identification of the three most frequent species isolated: S. epidermidis, S. haemolyticus, and S. saprophyticus subsp. saprophyticus. With the simple scheme, identification of CNS was possible within 24 h after the enzymatic tests were used, whereas up to 72 h is necessary for the growth tests. This methodology would be very useful in any clinical microbiology laboratory for the presumptive identification of CNS species groups and species.
Identification of coagulase negative staphylococcal species from bovine mastitis in India.
Bhavana R, Chaitanya R Iran J Vet Res. 2023; 23(4):358-362.
PMID: 36874184 PMC: 9984147. DOI: 10.22099/IJVR.2022.43698.6406.
Karah N, Rafei R, Elamin W, Ghazy A, Abbara A, Hamze M Diagnostics (Basel). 2020; 10(10).
PMID: 33081114 PMC: 7602787. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics10100832.
Clinical and Microbiological Aspects of β-Lactam Resistance in Staphylococcus lugdunensis.
McHardy I, Veltman J, Hindler J, Bruxvoort K, Carvalho M, Humphries R J Clin Microbiol. 2016; 55(2):585-595.
PMID: 27927926 PMC: 5277529. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.02092-16.
Rudresh M, Ravi G, Motagi A, Alex A, Sandhya P, Navaneeth B J Lab Physicians. 2015; 7(2):103-7.
PMID: 26417160 PMC: 4559621. DOI: 10.4103/0974-2727.163127.
Mehmood M, Khasawneh F Clin Pract. 2015; 5(1):706.
PMID: 25918631 PMC: 4387343. DOI: 10.4081/cp.2015.706.