» Articles » PMID: 12608666

Immediate Placement and Provisionalization of Maxillary Anterior Single Implants: 1-year Prospective Study

Overview
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2003 Mar 1
PMID 12608666
Citations 42
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: This 1-year prospective study evaluated the implant success rate, peri-implant tissue response, and esthetic outcome of immediately placed and provisionalized maxillary anterior single implants.

Materials And Methods: Thirty-five patients (8 men, 27 women) with a mean age of 36.5 years (range 18 to 65) were included in this study. Thirty-five threaded, hydroxyapatite-coated implants were placed and provisionalized immediately after each failing tooth had been removed. The definitive restoration was placed 6 months later. The patients were evaluated clinically and radiographically at implant placement and at 3, 6, and 12 months after implant placement.

Results: At 12 months, all implants remained osseointegrated. The mean marginal bone change from the time of implant placement to 12 months was -0.26 +/- 0.40 mm mesially and -0.22 +/- 0.28 mm distally. No significant differences in the Plaque Index scores were noted at different time intervals. The mean midfacial gingival level and mesial and distal papilla level changes from pretreatment to 12 months were -0.55 +/- 0.53 mm, -0.53 +/- 0.39 mm, and -0.39 +/- 0.40 mm, respectively. All patients were very satisfied with the esthetic outcome and none had noticed any changes at the gingival level.

Discussion: Although marginal bone and gingival level changes were statistically significant from pretreatment to 12 months of follow-up, they were well within clinical expectations.

Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that favorable implant success rates, peri-implant tissue responses, and esthetic outcomes can be achieved with immediately placed and provisionalized maxillary anterior single implants.

Citing Articles

Influence of supporting teeth quantity of surgical guide on the accuracy of the immediate implant in the maxillary central incisor: an in vitro study.

Nguyen M, Nguyen H, Nguyen T, Huynh N BDJ Open. 2024; 10(1):100.

PMID: 39732724 PMC: 11682062. DOI: 10.1038/s41405-024-00292-7.


Soft and hard tissue changes following immediate implant placement and immediate loading in aesthetic zone-a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Gaddale R, Chowdhary R, Mishra S, Sagar K Evid Based Dent. 2024; .

PMID: 39622908 DOI: 10.1038/s41432-024-01091-7.


The influence of connective tissue grafting on the reconstruction of a missing facial bone wall using immediate implant placement and simultaneous bone reconstruction: a retrospective long-term cohort study.

Kuebler A, Noelken R Int J Implant Dent. 2024; 10(1):25.

PMID: 38760582 PMC: 11101404. DOI: 10.1186/s40729-024-00533-2.


Marginal bone loss in implant placement among Indian patients with fresh extraction socket.

Sharma M, Pabbaraju S, Murugesan S, Gangadharappa P, Bhattacharyya S, Pankaj S Bioinformation. 2023; 19(6):770-774.

PMID: 37885790 PMC: 10598350. DOI: 10.6026/97320630019770.


Proposal of a Decision-Making Model for the Provisional Restoration Alternatives in Single-Tooth Implant Treatment.

Deniz Sr N, Orhan Sr E Cureus. 2023; 15(9):e45589.

PMID: 37868417 PMC: 10587859. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.45589.