» Articles » PMID: 12594982

Optical Determination of Anisotropic Material Properties of Bovine Articular Cartilage in Compression

Overview
Journal J Biomech
Specialty Physiology
Date 2003 Feb 22
PMID 12594982
Citations 45
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The precise nature of the material symmetry of articular cartilage in compression remains to be elucidated. The primary objective of this study was to determine the equilibrium compressive Young's moduli and Poisson's ratios of bovine cartilage along multiple directions (parallel and perpendicular to the split line direction, and normal to the articular surface) by loading small cubic specimens (0.9 x 0.9 x 0.8 mm, n =15) in unconfined compression, with the expectation that the material symmetry of cartilage could be determined more accurately with the help of a more complete set of material properties. The second objective was to investigate how the tension-compression nonlinearity of cartilage might alter the interpretation of material symmetry. Optimized digital image correlation was used to accurately determine the resultant strain fields within the specimens under loading. Experimental results demonstrated that neither the Young's moduli nor the Poisson's ratios exhibit the same values when measured along the three loading directions. The main findings of this study are that the framework of linear orthotropic elasticity (as well as higher symmetries of linear elasticity) is not suitable to describe the equilibrium response of articular cartilage nor characterize its material symmetry; a framework which accounts for the distinctly different responses of cartilage in tension and compression is more suitable for describing the equilibrium response of cartilage; within this framework, cartilage exhibits no lower than orthotropic symmetry.

Citing Articles

Relationship between depth-wise refractive index and biomechanical properties of human articular cartilage.

Khan B, Nippolainen E, Shahini F, Nonappa , Popov A, Toyras J J Biomed Opt. 2024; 29(9):095003.

PMID: 39309245 PMC: 11413650. DOI: 10.1117/1.JBO.29.9.095003.


Depth-Dependent Strain Model (1D) for Anisotropic Fibrils in Articular Cartilage.

Batool S, Roth B, Xia Y Materials (Basel). 2024; 17(1).

PMID: 38204091 PMC: 10779946. DOI: 10.3390/ma17010238.


Fiber reinforced hydrated networks recapitulate the poroelastic mechanics of articular cartilage.

Moore A, Hennessy M, Nogueira L, Franks S, Taffetani M, Seong H Acta Biomater. 2023; 167:69-82.

PMID: 37331613 PMC: 7617126. DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2023.06.015.


Bio-orthogonal Click Chemistry Methods to Evaluate the Metabolism of Inflammatory Challenged Cartilage after Traumatic Overloading.

Porter A, Wang L, Han L, Lu X ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2022; 8(6):2564-2573.

PMID: 35561285 PMC: 10461521. DOI: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.2c00024.


The Protective Function of Directed Asymmetry in the Pericellular Matrix Enveloping Chondrocytes.

Sibole S, Kuan Moo E, Federico S, Herzog W Ann Biomed Eng. 2022; 50(1):39-55.

PMID: 34993700 DOI: 10.1007/s10439-021-02900-1.


References
1.
Soulhat J, Buschmann M, Shirazi-Adl A . A fibril-network-reinforced biphasic model of cartilage in unconfined compression. J Biomech Eng. 1999; 121(3):340-7. DOI: 10.1115/1.2798330. View

2.
Khalsa P, Eisenberg S . Compressive behavior of articular cartilage is not completely explained by proteoglycan osmotic pressure. J Biomech. 1997; 30(6):589-94. DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9290(97)84508-3. View

3.
Roth V, Mow V . The intrinsic tensile behavior of the matrix of bovine articular cartilage and its variation with age. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1980; 62(7):1102-17. View

4.
Kempson G, Muir H, Pollard C, Tuke M . The tensile properties of the cartilage of human femoral condyles related to the content of collagen and glycosaminoglycans. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1973; 297(2):456-72. DOI: 10.1016/0304-4165(73)90093-7. View

5.
Schinagl R, Gurskis D, Chen A, Sah R . Depth-dependent confined compression modulus of full-thickness bovine articular cartilage. J Orthop Res. 1997; 15(4):499-506. DOI: 10.1002/jor.1100150404. View