» Articles » PMID: 12594584

A Phase II Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Dexmedetomidine for Sedation in the Medical Intensive Care Unit

Overview
Specialty Critical Care
Date 2003 Feb 21
PMID 12594584
Citations 58
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To evaluate dexmedetomidine for sedation of patients in the medical ICU.

Design And Setting: Prospective observational study in an intensive care unit of a university hospital. PATIENTS. Twelve ventilated patients with median APACHE II score 23 (range 10-26).

Interventions: Patients received a loading dexmedetomidine infusion of 1 microg x kg(-1) over 10 min followed by a maintenance infusion rate of 0.2-0.7 microg x kg(-1) x h(-1) for up to 7 days. After experience with the first four patients this maintenance rate of infusion was increased to a maximum of 2.5 microg kg(-1) x h(-1). If required, propofol and morphine provided rescue sedation and analgesia, respectively.

Results: The first four patients with dexmedetomidine infusion at 0.7 microg x kg(-1) x h(-1)all required rescue sedation with a propofol infusion. A protocol amendment allowed the next eight patients to receive higher dexmedetomidine infusions (mean 1.0+/- microg x kg(-1) x h(-1)). Five of the next eight patients did not required propofol, and two patients only required minimal propofol infusions (20-40 mg x h(-1)). A further patient, with hepatic encephalopathy, required a propofol at 50-100 mg x h(-1). Only modest falls in arterial pressure, heart rate and cardiac output were seen, and no rebound sequelae occurred on discontinuation of dexmedetomidine. Adverse cardiovascular events were nearly all confined to the initial loading dose period of dexmedetomidine.

Conclusions: Sedation with dexmedetomidine is efficacious in critically ill medical patients requiring mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit. A reduction in loading infusion is advised, but higher maintenance infusions may be required to that seen previously in the postoperative ICU patient.

Citing Articles

Combining O High Flow Nasal or Non-Invasive Ventilation with Cooperative Sedation to Avoid Intubation in Early Diffuse Severe Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Especially in Immunocompromised or COVID Patients?.

Petitjeans F, Longrois D, Ghignone M, Quintin L J Crit Care Med (Targu Mures). 2025; 10(4):291-315.

PMID: 39916864 PMC: 11799322. DOI: 10.2478/jccm-2024-0035.


Improved understanding of the respiratory drive pathophysiology could lead to earlier spontaneous breathing in severe acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Petitjeans F, Leroy S, Pichot C, Ghignone M, Quintin L, Longrois D Eur J Anaesthesiol Intensive Care. 2025; 2(5):e0030.

PMID: 39916810 PMC: 11783659. DOI: 10.1097/EA9.0000000000000030.


Dexmedetomidine: a real-world safety analysis based on FDA adverse event reporting system database.

Shuai Y, Chen Z, Wan Q, Wu J, Wang X Front Pharmacol. 2024; 15:1419196.

PMID: 39246655 PMC: 11377849. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1419196.


Mapping Theme Trends and Research Frontiers in Dexmedetomidine Over Past Decade: A Bibliometric Analysis.

Chen Z, Zuo Z, Song X, Zuo Y, Zhang L, Ye Y Drug Des Devel Ther. 2024; 18:3043-3061.

PMID: 39050803 PMC: 11268573. DOI: 10.2147/DDDT.S459431.


Use of dexmedetomidine in patients with sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials.

Zhang T, Mei Q, Dai S, Liu Y, Zhu H Ann Intensive Care. 2022; 12(1):81.

PMID: 36029410 PMC: 9420168. DOI: 10.1186/s13613-022-01052-2.