Prognostic Significance of Ischemic Electrocardiographic Changes During Vasodilator Stress Testing in Patients with Normal SPECT Images
Overview
Affiliations
Background: Patients with ischemic electrocardiographic (ECG) findings during exercise stress testing but normal perfusion images generally have a low risk of cardiac death or myocardial infarction (<1% per year). During vasodilator stress testing, however, the prognostic significance of the combination of normal perfusion images and ischemic ECG changes is unknown.
Methods And Results: Among 5526 patients who underwent vasodilator stress single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), 49 (0.9%) had normal images but ischemic ECG changes. A unique feature of this population was that 43 (88%) were women with a mean age of 67 +/- 10 years. Ischemic ECG changes occurred at a mean heart rate of 101 +/- 15 beats per minute and persisted for 6.8 +/- 4.7 minutes after termination of drug infusion. During follow-up of 28 +/- 20 months, cardiac death occurred in 2 patients and nonfatal myocardial infarction in 4 patients. The rate of cardiac death or nonfatal myocardial infarction was 4% at 1 year, 10% at 2 years, and 14% at 3 years. Of the 12 patients who underwent coronary angiography or autopsy during follow-up, 11 had multivessel coronary artery disease, indicating that these patients likely had false-negative SPECT image results. Eight patients required coronary revascularization.
Conclusions: The finding of ischemic ECG changes with normal SPECT images during vasodilator infusion is uncommon, occurs primarily in older women, and is associated with a higher subsequent cardiac event rate than is customarily associated with normal images.
Kokkinidis D, Kyriakoulis I, Chui P, Agarwal R, Liu Y, Khera R JACC Adv. 2025; 4(3):101618.
PMID: 39983619 PMC: 11891677. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101618.
Santos Argueta A, Ali J, Khan A, Singh B, Singal D Cureus. 2024; 16(2):e53789.
PMID: 38465084 PMC: 10923640. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.53789.
The chest pain guidelines revisited: cherry picking from the frequentist tree.
Christian T J Nucl Cardiol. 2022; 30(1):23-34.
PMID: 36258156 DOI: 10.1007/s12350-022-03109-y.
Bansal A, Ananthasubramaniam K Heart Fail Rev. 2022; 28(2):387-405.
PMID: 36129644 DOI: 10.1007/s10741-022-10270-6.
Taqueti V, Dorbala S, Wolinsky D, Abbott B, Heller G, Bateman T J Nucl Cardiol. 2017; 24(4):1402-1426.
PMID: 28585034 PMC: 5942593. DOI: 10.1007/s12350-017-0926-8.