» Articles » PMID: 12523637

Within-sample and Between-sample Variation of Antimicrobial Resistance in Fecal Escherichia Coli Isolates from Pigs

Overview
Publisher Mary Ann Liebert
Date 2003 Jan 14
PMID 12523637
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The present study was initiated to evaluate the effect of sampling time and within-sample variability on the diversity in antimicrobial resistance patterns in fecal Escherichia coli from healthy pigs. Isolates were tested against 11 antimicrobials. A total of 25 different profiles were observed, involving resistance to ampicillin, streptomycin, tetracycline, sulfonamides, trimethoprim, and/or a trimethoprim/sulfonamide combination. No isolates were resistant to enrofloxacin, gentamicin, or chloramfenicol, whereas resistance against neomycin and nalidixic acid was sporadically detected in isolates from grower pigs. A model that clusters pigs within-sampling time as a repeated factor and clusters isolates within individual pigs as a random factor was used. For sows, the variance component ratio of sampling time to residuals was 0.28-0.56 for the different antimicrobials (except ampicillin) and 0.85-1.79 for grower pigs. The variance components for within-sample variation were zero or close to zero, except in isolates from sows where resistance to ampicillin explained 14.8 times more of the variation compared to residuals. Thus, the effect of an animal's status at a given sampling time was more influential on the variability in antimicrobial resistance than within-animal diversity. We conclude that repeated sampling and analysis of one isolate per animal each time may be preferable for screening general tendencies, whereas several isolates have to be tested when individual animals are focused.

Citing Articles

Efficacy of neomycin dosing regimens for treating enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli-related post-weaning diarrhoea in a Danish nursery pig herd not using medicinal zinc oxide.

Morsing M, Larsen I, Pedersen K, Weber N, Nielsen J Porcine Health Manag. 2022; 8(1):46.

PMID: 36333767 PMC: 9635141. DOI: 10.1186/s40813-022-00283-w.


Genomic Microbial Epidemiology Is Needed to Comprehend the Global Problem of Antibiotic Resistance and to Improve Pathogen Diagnosis.

Wyrsch E, Roy Chowdhury P, Chapman T, Charles I, Hammond J, Djordjevic S Front Microbiol. 2016; 7:843.

PMID: 27379026 PMC: 4908116. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00843.


Sampling strategies in antimicrobial resistance monitoring: evaluating how precision and sensitivity vary with the number of animals sampled per farm.

Yamamoto T, Hayama Y, Hidano A, Kobayashi S, Muroga N, Ishikawa K PLoS One. 2014; 9(1):e87147.

PMID: 24466335 PMC: 3900725. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087147.


Genetic diversity and antimicrobial resistance among isolates of Escherichia coli O157: H7 from feces and hides of super-shedders and low-shedding pen-mates in two commercial beef feedlots.

Stanford K, Agopsowicz C, McAllister T BMC Vet Res. 2012; 8:178.

PMID: 23014060 PMC: 3582550. DOI: 10.1186/1746-6148-8-178.


Distribution and characterization of ampicillin- and tetracycline-resistant Escherichia coli from feedlot cattle fed subtherapeutic antimicrobials.

Mirzaagha P, Louie M, Sharma R, Yanke L, Topp E, McAllister T BMC Microbiol. 2011; 11:78.

PMID: 21504594 PMC: 3103423. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2180-11-78.