Absorbable Implants in Fracture Management
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
The use of absorbable implants has been studied extensively in the clinic and the laboratory. The limitations of absorbable implants are now well-known and include a finite life span and strength profile, the possible development of an inflammatory response, and their limitation to use in fractures that do not require traditional compression techniques. Advantages of these implants include the lack of necessity for removal at a later date, which has cost savings potential, their ease of use, and their strength, which may be sufficient for healing in certain situations. The most likely scenarios for the use of these implants in fracture management of the foot and ankle include syndesmotic disruptions, dislocations about the midfoot, and fractures of the medial malleolus.
Magnesium-Based Compression Screws in Acute Scaphoid Fractures and Nonunions.
Konneker S, Schachinger U, Vogt P World J Surg. 2023; 47(5):1129-1135.
PMID: 36774451 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-023-06937-2.
Bioabsorbable implants in forefoot surgery: a review of materials, possibilities and disadvantages.
Pisecky L, Luger M, Klasan A, Gotterbarm T, Klotz M, Hochgatterer R EFORT Open Rev. 2022; 6(12):1132-1139.
PMID: 35839087 PMC: 8693227. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.200157.
Absorbable implants versus metal implants for the treatment of ankle fractures: A meta-analysis.
Li Z, Yu A, Guo X, Qi B, Zhou M, Wang W Exp Ther Med. 2013; 5(5):1531-1537.
PMID: 23737914 PMC: 3671805. DOI: 10.3892/etm.2013.1017.