Hepatocyte Polarity and the Peroxisomal Compartment: a Comparative Study
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
In search of factors that regulate the phenotype of the peroxisomal compartment in wild-type liver parenchymal cells, we compared hepatocyte polarity to peroxisome differentiation, using adult liver as the standard. Differentiation parameters were evaluated in a three-dimensional culture model (spheroid), in 'sandwich' and monolayer primary hepatocyte cultures, and in 15.5 and 18.5-day-old foetal rat liver. Peroxisomes, studied by immunohistochemistry, enzyme histochemistry, and catalase specific activity, were better differentiated depending on foetal age (day 18.5 > day 15.5) and culture type (spheroid > sandwich > monolayer). The hepatocyte polarity markers ATP-, ADP-, and AMP-hydrolysing activities were, in all models, mislocalized at the lateral plasma membrane, whereas in contrast the multidrug resistance-associated protein 2 (mrp2) antigen was always correctly immunolocalized at the apical membrane domain. In cultures, the correct secretion of fluorescein (mrp2-mediated) into bile canaliculi was observed. Bile canaliculi (branching, ultrastructure and immunolocalization of the tight-junction associated protein ZO-1), were better differentiated in 18.5 than in 15.5-day-old foetal liver and in spheroid > sandwich > monolayer cultures. Our results show a parallelism between changes of the peroxisomal compartment and bile canalicular structure together with mrp2-mediated secretory function. Distinct polarization characteristics do not necessarily change simultaneously, suggesting different regulatory mechanisms.
Liu K, Li L, He Y, Zhang S, You H, Wang P Stem Cell Res Ther. 2025; 16(1):131.
PMID: 40069754 PMC: 11899129. DOI: 10.1186/s13287-025-04253-1.
Tao F, Sayo K, Sugimoto K, Aoki S, Kojima N Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):6567.
PMID: 32300241 PMC: 7162899. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-63621-4.
Deng J, Zhang X, Chen Z, Luo Y, Lu Y, Liu T Biomicrofluidics. 2019; 13(2):024101.
PMID: 31040885 PMC: 6456354. DOI: 10.1063/1.5070088.
Chu Q, Zhao Y, Shi X, Han W, Zhang Y, Zheng X Sci Rep. 2017; 7(1):14837.
PMID: 29093461 PMC: 5665964. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-13147-z.
Models and methods for in vitro testing of hepatic gap junctional communication.
Maes M, Crespo Yanguas S, Willebrords J, Vinken M Toxicol In Vitro. 2015; 30(1 Pt B):569-577.
PMID: 26420514 PMC: 4685743. DOI: 10.1016/j.tiv.2015.09.024.