» Articles » PMID: 12463857

Web-based Tailoring and Its Effect on Self-efficacy: Results from the MI-HEART Randomized Controlled Trial

Overview
Journal Proc AMIA Symp
Date 2002 Dec 5
PMID 12463857
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This paper reports the effects of a tailored Web-based delivery system on self-efficacy as it relates to a patients' response to acute myocardial information (AMI) symptoms. The data reported are from MI-HEART, a randomized trial examining ways in which a clinical information system can favorably influence the appropriateness and rapidity of decision-making in patients suffering from symptoms of acute myocardial infarction. Participants were randomized into one of three groups: tailored Web-based, non-tailored Web-based and non-tailored paper based. A theoretically based behavioral-cognitive model was used to identify key variables upon which to tailor education material. A key variable in the model is self-efficacy, operationalized with a three-dimensional scaling. Results show trends in improved self-efficacy scores for all groups at 1-month follow up, with sustained significant increases in baseline to 3-month scores only in the tailored Web-based group. One possible explanation could be related to "hit-count", which was significantly higher in the tailored group. This study is a first step in quantifying the contribution of Web-based tailoring over non-tailoring in changing key determinants of patient delay to AMI symptoms.

Citing Articles

Online Module for Carrier Screening in Ashkenazi Jewish Individuals Compared with In-Person Genetics Education: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Fan C, Castonguay L, Rummell S, Levesque S, Mitchell J, Sillon G J Genet Couns. 2017; 27(2):426-438.

PMID: 28791521 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-017-0133-4.


Detecting the effects of physician training in self-care interviewing skills: Coding of standardized patient (SP) visit recordings versus SP post-visit ratings.

Jerant A, Hanson B, Kravitz R, Tancredi D, Hanes E, Grewal S Patient Educ Couns. 2016; 100(2):367-371.

PMID: 27578271 PMC: 5318274. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.08.021.


Physician training in self-efficacy enhancing interviewing techniques (SEE IT): Effects on patient psychological health behavior change mediators.

Jerant A, Lichte M, Kravitz R, Tancredi D, Magnan E, Hudnut A Patient Educ Couns. 2016; 99(11):1865-1872.

PMID: 27423177 PMC: 5069145. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.07.002.


Training Primary Care Physicians to Employ Self-Efficacy-Enhancing Interviewing Techniques: Randomized Controlled Trial of a Standardized Patient Intervention.

Jerant A, Kravitz R, Tancredi D, Paterniti D, White L, Baker-Nauman L J Gen Intern Med. 2016; 31(7):716-22.

PMID: 26956140 PMC: 4907951. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-016-3644-z.


Internet-based interventions for the secondary prevention of coronary heart disease.

Devi R, Singh S, Powell J, Fulton E, Igbinedion E, Rees K Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015; (12):CD009386.

PMID: 26691216 PMC: 10819100. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009386.pub2.


References
1.
Dracup K, Moser D, Eisenberg M, Meischke H, Alonzo A, Braslow A . Causes of delay in seeking treatment for heart attack symptoms. Soc Sci Med. 1995; 40(3):379-92. DOI: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)00278-2. View

2.
Kukafka R, Lussier Y, Patel V, Cimino J . Modeling patient response to acute myocardial infarction: implications for a tailored technology-based program to reduce patient delay. Proc AMIA Symp. 1999; :570-4. PMC: 2232851. View

3.
Skinner C, Campbell M, Rimer B, Curry S, Prochaska J . How effective is tailored print communication?. Ann Behav Med. 2000; 21(4):290-8. DOI: 10.1007/BF02895960. View

4.
Campbell M, DeVellis B, Strecher V, Ammerman A, DeVellis R, Sandler R . Improving dietary behavior: the effectiveness of tailored messages in primary care settings. Am J Public Health. 1994; 84(5):783-7. PMC: 1615043. DOI: 10.2105/ajph.84.5.783. View

5.
Bandura A, Reese L, Adams N . Microanalysis of action and fear arousal as a function of differential levels of perceived self-efficacy. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1982; 43(1):5-21. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.43.1.5. View