» Articles » PMID: 12454804

A 10-year Review of Quality Improvement Monitoring in Pain Management: Recommendations for Standardized Outcome Measures

Overview
Journal Pain Manag Nurs
Date 2002 Nov 28
PMID 12454804
Citations 37
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Quality measurement in health care is complex and in a constant state of evolution. Different approaches are necessary depending on the purpose of the measurement (e.g., accountability, research, improvement). Recent changes in health care accreditation standards are driving increased attention to measurement of the quality of pain management for improvement purposes. The purpose of this article is to determine what indicators are being used for pain quality improvement, compare results across studies, and provide specific recommendations to simplify and standardize future measurement of quality for hospital-based pain management initiatives. Pain management quality improvement monitoring experience and data from 1992 to 2001 were analyzed from 20 studies performed at eight large hospitals in the United States. Hospitals included: the University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison; Texas Medical Center, Houston; McAllen Medical Center, McAllen, TX; San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco; Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical Center and Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, IL; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York; and Kaiser Sunnyside Medical Center of Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Clackamas, OR. Analyses of data led to consensus on six quality indicators for hospital-based pain management. These indicators include: the intensity of pain is documented with a numeric or descriptive rating scale; pain intensity is documented at frequent intervals; pain is treated by a route other than intramuscular; pain is treated with regularly administered analgesics, and when possible, a multimodal approach is used; pain is prevented and controlled to a degree that facilitates function and quality of life; and patients are adequately informed and knowledgeable about pain management. Although there are no perfect measures of quality, longitudinal data support the validity of a core set of indicators that could be used to obtain benchmark data for quality improvement in pain management in the hospital setting.

Citing Articles

Subjective risk factors of severe pain at discharge from the emergency department.

Tandzi Tonleu F, Pilet C, Lagarde E, Gil-Jardine C, Galinski M, Lafont S Intern Emerg Med. 2024; .

PMID: 39107668 DOI: 10.1007/s11739-024-03730-4.


A Single Center Exploratory Survey of Patients and Nurses on post-Surgical Oral Opioid Delivery Through Patient-Controlled Analgesia.

Mirza D, Zha L, See C, Paoletti I, Dai F, Hocevar M J Pain Res. 2024; 17:2483-2494.

PMID: 39081328 PMC: 11288353. DOI: 10.2147/JPR.S461379.


Pharmacogenetic Approaches in Personalized Medicine for Postoperative Pain Management.

Ferreira do Couto M, Fonseca S, Pozza D Biomedicines. 2024; 12(4).

PMID: 38672085 PMC: 11048650. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12040729.


Postoperative pain-related outcomes and perioperative pain management in China: a population-based study.

Liu Y, Xiao S, Yang H, Lv X, Hou A, Ma Y Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2023; 39:100822.

PMID: 37927993 PMC: 10625022. DOI: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2023.100822.


Patients' satisfaction with post-operative pain management in Ayder Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study.

Alema N, Asgedom S, Welegebrial B, Atey T, Araya E, Gebremedhin H Pan Afr Med J. 2023; 45:94.

PMID: 37692982 PMC: 10491717. DOI: 10.11604/pamj.2023.45.94.22563.