» Articles » PMID: 12454080

Sex-specific Differences in Meiotic Chromosome Segregation Revealed by Dicentric Bridge Resolution in Mice

Overview
Journal Genetics
Specialty Genetics
Date 2002 Nov 28
PMID 12454080
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The meiotic properties of paracentric inversion heterozygotes have been well studied in insects and plants, but not in mammalian species. In essence, a single meiotic recombination event within the inverted region results in the formation of a dicentric chromatid, which usually breaks or is stretched between the two daughter nuclei during the first meiotic anaphase. Here, we provide evidence that this is not the predominant mode of exchange resolution in female mice. In sharp contrast to previous observations in other organisms, we find that attempts to segregate the dicentric chromatid frequently result not in breakage, stretching, or loss, but instead in precocious separation of the sister centromeres of at least one homolog. This often further results in intact segregation of the dicentric into one of the meiotic products, where it can persist into the first few embryonic divisions. These novel observations point to an unusual mechanism for the processing of dicentric chromosomes in mammalian oogenesis. Furthermore, this mechanism is rare or nonexistent in mammalian spermatogenesis. Thus, our results provide additional evidence of sexual dimorphism in mammalian meiotic chromosome behavior; in "stressful" situations, meiotic sister chromatid cohesion is apparently handled differently in males than in females.

Citing Articles

Two telomeric ends of acrocentric chromosome play distinct roles in homologous chromosome synapsis in the fetal mouse oocyte.

Kazemi P, Taketo T Chromosoma. 2021; 130(1):41-52.

PMID: 33492414 DOI: 10.1007/s00412-021-00752-1.


Meiotic spindle assembly checkpoint and aneuploidy in males versus females.

Lane S, Kauppi L Cell Mol Life Sci. 2018; 76(6):1135-1150.

PMID: 30564841 PMC: 6513798. DOI: 10.1007/s00018-018-2986-6.


How chromosomal rearrangements shape adaptation and speciation: Case studies in Drosophila pseudoobscura and its sibling species Drosophila persimilis.

Fuller Z, Koury S, Phadnis N, Schaeffer S Mol Ecol. 2018; 28(6):1283-1301.

PMID: 30402909 PMC: 6475473. DOI: 10.1111/mec.14923.


A primer on the use of mouse models for identifying direct sex chromosome effects that cause sex differences in non-gonadal tissues.

Burgoyne P, Arnold A Biol Sex Differ. 2016; 7:68.

PMID: 27999654 PMC: 5154145. DOI: 10.1186/s13293-016-0115-5.


The expression of Y-linked Zfy2 in XY mouse oocytes leads to frequent meiosis 2 defects, a high incidence of subsequent early cleavage stage arrest and infertility.

Vernet N, Szot M, Mahadevaiah S, Ellis P, Decarpentrie F, Ojarikre O Development. 2014; 141(4):855-66.

PMID: 24496622 PMC: 3912830. DOI: 10.1242/dev.091165.


References
1.
Tease C, Fisher G . Further examination of the production-line hypothesis in mouse foetal oocytes. I. Inversion heterozygotes. Chromosoma. 1986; 93(5):447-52. DOI: 10.1007/BF00285827. View

2.
Evans E, BRECKON G, Ford C . AN AIR-DRYING METHOD FOR MEIOTIC PREPARATIONS FROM MAMMALIAN TESTES. Cytogenetics. 1964; 3:289-94. DOI: 10.1159/000129818. View

3.
Wang Z, Castano I, De Las Penas A, Adams C, Christman M . Pol kappa: A DNA polymerase required for sister chromatid cohesion. Science. 2000; 289(5480):774-9. DOI: 10.1126/science.289.5480.774. View

4.
Roderick T, Hawes N . Nineteen paracentric chromosomal inversions in mice. Genetics. 1974; 76(1):109-17. PMC: 1213047. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/76.1.109. View

5.
Rumpler Y, Volobouev V, Yu W, Rasamimanana P, de Perdigo A . Male sterility and double heterozygosity for chromosomal inversion. Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1995; 69(1-2):66-70. DOI: 10.1159/000133940. View