» Articles » PMID: 12452398

Hypopharyngeal PH Monitoring Artifact in Detection of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux

Overview
Journal Dig Dis Sci
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2002 Nov 28
PMID 12452398
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Hypopharyngeal pH artifacts have been a concern in the detection of laryngopharyngeal reflux. Our purpose was to analyze and quantify artifacts from dual-sensor hypopharyngeal pH monitoring. In all, 42 hypopharyngeal and 58 esophageal pH studies were reviewed. Type 1 (out of range), type 2 (pH drift), and type 3 (isolated pH drop) artifacts were identified. The proportion of proximal-sensor pH drop to <4 that was artifactual was determined. The median number (range) of artifacts was 1 (0-17) and 2 (0-28) for hypopharyngeal and esophageal pH studies, respectively (P = NS). The median proportion of artifactual pH drop to <4 was 1% (0-84%) and 2% (0-74%) for hypopharyngeal and esophageal pH studies, respectively (P = NS). The diagnosis did not change in any patient after excluding pH artifacts. In all, 19% of the combined 2,432 hypopharyngeal pH drops of <4 were artifacts. In conclusion, hypopharyngeal pH artifacts per study were uncommon but can be prominent in a few patients. One can identify these artifacts and exclude them from analysis.

Citing Articles

Acidic Pharyngeal Reflux Does Not Correlate with Symptoms and Laryngeal Injury Attributed to Laryngopharyngeal Reflux.

duricek M, Banovcin P, Halickova T, Hyrdel R, Kollarik M Dig Dis Sci. 2018; 64(5):1270-1280.

PMID: 30430298 PMC: 10694844. DOI: 10.1007/s10620-018-5372-1.


A Study to Draw a Normative Database of Laryngopharynx pH Profile in Chinese.

Feng G, Wang J, Zhang L, Liu Y J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2014; 20(3):347-51.

PMID: 24948130 PMC: 4102165. DOI: 10.5056/jnm13138.


Ratio between proximal/distal gastroesophageal reflux does not discriminate abnormal proximal reflux.

Neto S, Herbella F, Silva L, Patti M World J Surg. 2013; 38(4):890-6.

PMID: 24305918 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-013-2341-x.


A new technique for measurement of pharyngeal pH: normal values and discriminating pH threshold.

Ayazi S, Lipham J, Hagen J, Tang A, Zehetner J, Leers J J Gastrointest Surg. 2009; 13(8):1422-9.

PMID: 19421822 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-009-0915-6.


Proximal sensor data from routine dual-sensor esophageal pH monitoring is often inaccurate.

McCollough M, Jabbar A, Cacchione R, Allen J, Harrell S, Wo J Dig Dis Sci. 2004; 49(10):1607-11.

PMID: 15573913 DOI: 10.1023/b:ddas.0000043372.98660.82.

References
1.
Katz P . Ambulatory esophageal and hypopharyngeal pH monitoring in patients with hoarseness. Am J Gastroenterol. 1990; 85(1):38-40. View

2.
Wiener G, Koufman J, Wu W, Cooper J, Richter J, Castell D . Chronic hoarseness secondary to gastroesophageal reflux disease: documentation with 24-h ambulatory pH monitoring. Am J Gastroenterol. 1989; 84(12):1503-8. View

3.
Fraser A, Morton R, Gillibrand J . Presumed laryngo-pharyngeal reflux: investigate or treat?. J Laryngol Otol. 2000; 114(6):441-7. DOI: 10.1258/0022215001906020. View

4.
Smit C, Tan J, Devriese P, Brandsen M, Schouwenburg P . Ambulatory pH measurements at the upper esophageal sphincter. Laryngoscope. 1998; 108(2):299-302. DOI: 10.1097/00005537-199802000-00027. View

5.
Weusten B, Akkermans L, vanBerge-Henegouwen G, Smout A . Spatiotemporal characteristics of physiological gastroesophageal reflux. Am J Physiol. 1994; 266(3 Pt 1):G357-62. DOI: 10.1152/ajpgi.1994.266.3.G357. View