» Articles » PMID: 12445338

Preliminary Experience Using a Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Cage in the Treatment of Cervical Disc Disease

Overview
Journal Neurosurgery
Specialty Neurosurgery
Date 2002 Nov 26
PMID 12445338
Citations 63
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: We investigated the effectiveness of a new material, polyetheretherketone (PEEK), in a spinal cage used in performing cervical spinal fusion for the correction of cervical kyphosis.

Methods: A total of 80 patients with various cervical diseases were divided into two groups. Patients in Group A (40 patients) underwent microdiscectomy and PEEK cage fusion, and patients in Group B (40 patients) were treated with microdisectomy and autogenous iliac crest graft (AICG) fusion. We evaluated the patients for cervical lordosis, the height of the foramina, the cross sectional area of the foramina, and fusion status on the basis of x-rays. The patients' neurological and functional outcomes were assessed on the basis of the Prolo scale. Magnetic resonance imaging was also performed for spinal cord evaluation.

Results: The use of the PEEK cage in patients who undergo spinal fusion may increase cervical lordosis (mean, 2.33 +/- 3.00 mm; P = 0.03), whereas AICG fusion may not (mean, -0.84 +/- 6.69 mm; P = 0.49). The use of the PEEK cage was found to increase the height of the foramina (mean, 2.54 +/- 1.40 mm; P = 0.00) and increase its cross sectional area (mean, 40.36 +/- 23.53 mm2; P = 0.00). The height of the foramina increased only in the PEEK group postoperatively. The cross sectional area of the foramina increased in both groups postoperatively. The complication rate in patients who underwent fusion procedures with the PEEK cage was less than that in patients who underwent fusion with AICG fusion (2.50 versus 17.50%; P = 0.03). Both groups had a satisfactory fusion rate (100 versus 93.1%). The patients' postoperative Prolo scale scores were statistically better in the PEEK group (8.50 +/- 1.49 versus 7.17 +/- 2.13; P = 0.00), and more patients in the PEEK group than in the AICG group achieved excellent outcomes (66.63 versus 28.57%; P = 0.00). Because PEEK is radiotransparent on x-rays and few artifacts are seen on magnetic resonance imaging scans, it is better suited than autogenous iliac crest donor material for postoperative radiographic evaluation.

Conclusion: The PEEK cage provides solid fusion, increased cervical lordosis, and increased height and cross sectional area of the foramina. There are few complications associated with the use of this cage, and the functional and neurological outcomes are satisfactory. It also facilitates postoperative x-ray and magnetic resonance imaging evaluation. The PEEK cage is therefore a good substitute for AICG fusion in patients with cervical disc disease.

Citing Articles

The Impact of Single-Level ACDF on Neural Foramen and Disc Height of Surgical and Adjacent Cervical Segments: A Case-Series Radiological Analysis.

Maugeri R, Brunasso L, Sciortino A, Scerrati A, Buscemi F, Basile L Brain Sci. 2023; 13(1).

PMID: 36672082 PMC: 9857145. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci13010101.


Review of anterior cervical diskectomy/fusion (ACDF) using different polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages.

Epstein N, Agulnick M Surg Neurol Int. 2023; 13:556.

PMID: 36600749 PMC: 9805606. DOI: 10.25259/SNI_992_2022.


Titanium versus polyetheretherketone versus structural allograft in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: A systematic review.

Goldberg J, Meaden R, Hussain I, Gadjradj P, Quraishi D, Sommer F Brain Spine. 2022; 2:100923.

PMID: 36248133 PMC: 9560672. DOI: 10.1016/j.bas.2022.100923.


Influence of subsidence after stand-alone anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in patients with degenerative cervical disease: A long-term follow-up study.

Ryu H, Han M, Lee S, Moon B, Lee J Medicine (Baltimore). 2022; 101(38):e30673.

PMID: 36197165 PMC: 9509047. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000030673.


Zero-Profile Anchored Spacer (ROI-C) in the Treatment of Cervical Adjacent Segment Disease.

Iampreechakul P, Choochaimangkhala P, Tirakotai W, Hangsapruek S, Puthkhao P, Tanpun A Asian J Neurosurg. 2022; 17(2):209-217.

PMID: 36120612 PMC: 9473862. DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1750837.