Correlates of Load Carriage and Obstacle Course Performance Among Women
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
To examine correlates of the speed at which female soldiers carrying loads could cover 3.2 km on foot and traverse an obstacle course, 12 volunteers (mean +/- SD: 25.3 +/- 6 years, 166 +/- 7 cm, 61.3 +/- 7 kg) were timed over 3.2 km while carrying loads of 14, 27, and 41 kg, and while traversing an obstacle course with the two lighter loads. Pearson correlations showed that absolute VO_[2 max] and 3.2 km run time without a load were the best predictors of 3.2 km load carriage time for all loads. Also, larger subjects with greater muscle mass were able to carry the heaviest load faster than smaller, less muscular subjects, likely because the 41 kg load represented a smaller percentage of the former's bodyweight. Maximum number of sit-ups and push-ups, composite score of the Army Physical Fitness Test as well as body height were positively correlated with the speed at which some course segments were traversed.
Hosseini M, Heidarimoghaddam R, Anbarian M, Ilbeigi S, Tapak L BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024; 24(1):37.
PMID: 38360533 PMC: 10867988. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-024-02169-7.
International society of sports nutrition position stand: tactical athlete nutrition.
Gonzalez D, McAllister M, Waldman H, Ferrando A, Joyce J, Barringer N J Int Soc Sports Nutr. 2022; 19(1):267-315.
PMID: 35813846 PMC: 9261739. DOI: 10.1080/15502783.2022.2086017.
Body-worn IMU array reveals effects of load on performance in an outdoor obstacle course.
Vitali R, Cain S, Ojeda L, Potter M, Zaferiou A, Davidson S PLoS One. 2019; 14(3):e0214008.
PMID: 30897123 PMC: 6428270. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214008.
A Comparison of Military and Law Enforcement Body Armour.
Orr R, Schram B, Pope R Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018; 15(2).
PMID: 29443905 PMC: 5858408. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15020339.
Joseph A, Wiley A, Orr R, Schram B, Dawes J Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018; 15(1).
PMID: 29316674 PMC: 5800187. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15010088.