» Articles » PMID: 12421654

Evidence of Conscious and Subconscious Olfactory Information Processing During Word Encoding: a Magnetoencephalographic (MEG) Study

Overview
Specialties Neurology
Psychology
Date 2002 Nov 8
PMID 12421654
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The present study was meant to distinguish between unconscious and conscious olfactory information processing and to investigate the influence of olfaction on word information processing. Magnetic field changes were recorded in healthy young participants during deep encoding of visually presented words whereby some of the words were randomly associated with an odor. All recorded data were then split into two groups. One group consisted of participants who did not consciously perceive the odor during the whole experiment whereas the other group did report continuous conscious odor perception. The magnetic field changes related to the condition 'words without odor' were subtracted from the magnetic field changes related to the condition 'words with odor' for both groups. First, an odor-induced effect occurred between about 200 and 500 ms after stimulus onset which was similar in both groups. It is interpreted to reflect an activity reduction during word encoding related to the additional olfactory stimulation. Second, a later effect occurred between about 600 and 900 ms after stimulus onset which differed between the two groups. This effect was due to higher brain activity related to the additional olfactory stimulation. It was more pronounced in the group consisting of participants who consciously perceived the odor during the whole experiment as compared to the other group. These results are interpreted as evidence that the later effect is related to conscious odor perception whereas the earlier effect reflects unconscious olfactory information processing. Furthermore, our study provides evidence that only the conscious perception of an odor which is simultaneously presented to the visual presentation of a word reduces its chance to be subsequently recognized.

Citing Articles

Neuromapping olfactory stimulation using magnetoencephalography - visualizing smell, a proof-of-concept study.

Tarfa R, Yu S, Ahmed O, Moore J, Bruna R, Velasquez N Front Allergy. 2023; 3:1019265.

PMID: 36698377 PMC: 9869273. DOI: 10.3389/falgy.2022.1019265.


A hypothesis concerning distinct schemes of olfactory activation evoked by perceived versus nonperceived input.

Traub R, Whittington M Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022; 119(10):e2120093119.

PMID: 35238656 PMC: 8915958. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2120093119.


Food Preference and Appetite after Switching between Sweet and Savoury Odours in Women.

Ramaekers M, Luning P, Lakemond C, van Boekel M, Gort G, Boesveldt S PLoS One. 2016; 11(1):e0146652.

PMID: 26751975 PMC: 4709072. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146652.


Dysfunctional Incidental Olfaction in Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI): An Electroencephalography (EEG) Study.

Walla P, Duregger C, Deecke L, Dal-Bianco P Brain Sci. 2014; 1(1):3-15.

PMID: 24962612 PMC: 4061781. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci1010003.


Odours influence visually induced emotion: behavior and neuroimaging.

Walla P, Deecke L Sensors (Basel). 2011; 10(9):8185-97.

PMID: 22163649 PMC: 3231228. DOI: 10.3390/s100908185.