» Articles » PMID: 12409475

A Common Reference for CDNA Microarray Hybridizations

Overview
Specialty Biochemistry
Date 2002 Nov 1
PMID 12409475
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Comparisons of expression levels across different cDNA microarray experiments are easier when a common reference is co-hybridized to every microarray. Often this reference consists of one experimental control sample, a pool of cell lines or a mix of all samples to be analyzed. We have developed an alternative common reference consisting of a mix of the products that are spotted on the array. Pooling part of the cDNA PCR products before they are printed and their subsequent amplification towards either sense or antisense cRNA provides an excellent common reference. Our results show that this reference yields a reproducible hybridization signal in 99.5% of the cDNA probes spotted on the array. Accordingly, a ratio can be calculated for every spot, and expression levels across different hybridizations can be compared. In dye-swap experiments this reference shows no significant ratio differences, with 95% of the spots within an interval of +/-0.2-fold change. The described method can be used in hybridizations with both amplified and non-amplified targets, is time saving and provides a constant batch of common reference that lasts for thousands of hybridizations.

Citing Articles

Gene expression profiling of three different stressors in the water flea Daphnia magna.

Jansen M, Vergauwen L, Vandenbrouck T, Knapen D, Dom N, Spanier K Ecotoxicology. 2013; 22(5):900-14.

PMID: 23564370 DOI: 10.1007/s10646-013-1072-y.


Multipurpose instantaneous microarray detection of acute encephalitis causing viruses and their expression profiles.

Singh D, Jain A Curr Microbiol. 2012; 65(3):290-303.

PMID: 22674173 PMC: 7080014. DOI: 10.1007/s00284-012-0154-z.


Transcriptional profiling of the iron starvation response in Bordetella pertussis provides new insights into siderophore utilization and virulence gene expression.

Brickman T, Cummings C, Liew S, Relman D, Armstrong S J Bacteriol. 2011; 193(18):4798-812.

PMID: 21742863 PMC: 3165686. DOI: 10.1128/JB.05136-11.


Transcriptomic "portraits" of canine mammary cancer cell lines with various phenotypes.

Krol M, Pawlowski K, Skierski J, Turowski P, Majewska A, Polanska J J Appl Genet. 2010; 51(2):169-83.

PMID: 20453304 DOI: 10.1007/BF03195725.


Tungsten carbide cobalt nanoparticles exert hypoxia-like effects on the gene expression level in human keratinocytes.

Busch W, Kuhnel D, Schirmer K, Scholz S BMC Genomics. 2010; 11:65.

PMID: 20105288 PMC: 2824725. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-11-65.


References
1.
DeRisi J, Iyer V, Brown P . Exploring the metabolic and genetic control of gene expression on a genomic scale. Science. 1997; 278(5338):680-6. DOI: 10.1126/science.278.5338.680. View

2.
Lennon G, Auffray C, Polymeropoulos M, Soares M . The I.M.A.G.E. Consortium: an integrated molecular analysis of genomes and their expression. Genomics. 1996; 33(1):151-2. DOI: 10.1006/geno.1996.0177. View

3.
Luo L, Salunga R, Guo H, Bittner A, Joy K, Galindo J . Gene expression profiles of laser-captured adjacent neuronal subtypes. Nat Med. 1999; 5(1):117-22. DOI: 10.1038/4806. View

4.
Brown P, Botstein D . Exploring the new world of the genome with DNA microarrays. Nat Genet. 1999; 21(1 Suppl):33-7. DOI: 10.1038/4462. View

5.
Eisen M, Brown P . DNA arrays for analysis of gene expression. Methods Enzymol. 1999; 303:179-205. DOI: 10.1016/s0076-6879(99)03014-1. View