» Articles » PMID: 12396508

Population Growth Rate and Its Determinants: an Overview

Overview
Specialty Biology
Date 2002 Oct 25
PMID 12396508
Citations 94
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We argue that population growth rate is the key unifying variable linking the various facets of population ecology. The importance of population growth rate lies partly in its central role in forecasting future population trends; indeed if the form of density dependence were constant and known, then the future population dynamics could to some degree be predicted. We argue that population growth rate is also central to our understanding of environmental stress: environmental stressors should be defined as factors which when first applied to a population reduce population growth rate. The joint action of such stressors determines an organism's ecological niche, which should be defined as the set of environmental conditions where population growth rate is greater than zero (where population growth rate = r = log(e)(N(t+1)/N(t))). While environmental stressors have negative effects on population growth rate, the same is true of population density, the case of negative linear effects corresponding to the well-known logistic equation. Following Sinclair, we recognize population regulation as occurring when population growth rate is negatively density dependent. Surprisingly, given its fundamental importance in population ecology, only 25 studies were discovered in the literature in which population growth rate has been plotted against population density. In 12 of these the effects of density were linear; in all but two of the remainder the relationship was concave viewed from above. Alternative approaches to establishing the determinants of population growth rate are reviewed, paying special attention to the demographic and mechanistic approaches. The effects of population density on population growth rate may act through their effects on food availability and associated effects on somatic growth, fecundity and survival, according to a 'numerical response', the evidence for which is briefly reviewed. Alternatively, there may be effects on population growth rate of population density in addition to those that arise through the partitioning of food between competitors; this is 'interference competition'. The distinction is illustrated using a replicated laboratory experiment on a marine copepod, Tisbe battagliae. Application of these approaches in conservation biology, ecotoxicology and human demography is briefly considered. We conclude that population regulation, density dependence, resource and interference competition, the effects of environmental stress and the form of the ecological niche, are all best defined and analysed in terms of population growth rate.

Citing Articles

Continent-Wide Drivers of Spatial Synchrony in Breeding Demographic Structure Across Wild Great Tit Populations.

Woodman J, Vriend S, Adriaensen F, Alvarez E, Artemyev A, Barba E Ecol Lett. 2025; 28(2):e70079.

PMID: 39964053 PMC: 11834383. DOI: 10.1111/ele.70079.


Environmental variability across space and time drives the recolonization pattern of a historically persecuted large carnivore.

Moqanaki E, Milleret C, Dupont P, Mattisson J, Dey S, Broseth H Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025; 122(5):e2401679122.

PMID: 39869793 PMC: 11804516. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2401679122.


A geometric morphometric approach for detecting different reproductive stages of a free-ranging killer whale Orcinus orca population.

Robinson C, Visona-Kelly B Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):3239.

PMID: 39863647 PMC: 11762319. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-86793-3.


Evaluating Ecosystem Characteristics and Ecological Carrying Capacity for Marine Fauna Stock Enhancement Within a Marine Ranching System.

Feng J, Yu H, Wu L, Yuan C, Zhao X, Sun H Animals (Basel). 2025; 15(2).

PMID: 39858165 PMC: 11758635. DOI: 10.3390/ani15020165.


Improving wild animal welfare through contraception.

Eckerstrom Liedholm S, Hecht L, Elliott V Bioscience. 2024; 74(10):695-700.

PMID: 39444510 PMC: 11494473. DOI: 10.1093/biosci/biae071.


References
1.
Courchamp , Grenfell . Inverse density dependence and the Allee effect. Trends Ecol Evol. 1999; 14(10):405-410. DOI: 10.1016/s0169-5347(99)01683-3. View

2.
Beddington J, May R . Harvesting natural populations in a randomly fluctuating environment. Science. 1977; 197(4302):463-5. DOI: 10.1126/science.197.4302.463. View

3.
Clark C . The economics of overexploitation. Science. 1973; 181(4100):630-4. DOI: 10.1126/science.181.4100.630. View

4.
Cole L . Sketches of general and comparative demography. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1957; 22:1-15. DOI: 10.1101/sqb.1957.022.01.004. View

5.
Krebs C, Boutin S, Boonstra R, Sinclair A, Smith J, Dale M . Impact of food and predation on the snowshoe hare cycle. Science. 1995; 269(5227):1112-5. DOI: 10.1126/science.269.5227.1112. View