» Articles » PMID: 12391312

Fractionating the Neural Substrate of Cognitive Control Processes

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2002 Oct 23
PMID 12391312
Citations 59
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Psychological and neurobiological theories of cognitive control must account for flexible, seemless transitions among cognitive operations. When subjects switch between tasks, they must both inhibit the previous task and re-engage in a different task. Inhibition of the disengaged task remains active for a period of time and has to be overcome when re-engaging in the same task. Here we used a task-switching paradigm that allows distinction of two control processes: overcoming the inhibition of a previously performed task when re-engaging it and restarting a sequence of tasks after a period of interruption. Behaviorally, these processes were reflected in the facts that: (i) switching to a recently performed task, that is thus unlikely to have fully recovered from inhibition, takes longer than switching to a task less recently performed and (ii) re-engaging in a sequence of tasks after a period of interruption transiently increases response time. Using event-related functional MRI, we found that these two behavioral effects were accompanied by a double dissociation: the right lateral prefrontal cortex was more activated when switching to a task recently performed compared to a task less recently performed, while the anterior cingulate cortex was recruited when a sequence of tasks was initiated. These results provide insights into the functional organization of the frontal lobe in humans and its role in distinct processes involved in cognitive control.

Citing Articles

Alcohol, flexible behavior, and the prefrontal cortex: Functional changes underlying impaired cognitive flexibility.

Nippert K, Rowland C, Vazey E, Moorman D Neuropharmacology. 2024; 260:110114.

PMID: 39134298 PMC: 11694314. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2024.110114.


Media Multitasking in Mixed Reality Learning Situations: What Determines Its Effectiveness?.

Soldatova G, Koshevaya A Psychol Russ. 2024; 16(4):90-108.

PMID: 38162810 PMC: 10755959. DOI: 10.11621/pir.2023.0406.


Topology of the lateral visual system: The fundus of the superior temporal sulcus and parietal area H connect nonvisual cerebrum to the lateral occipital lobe.

Dadario N, Tanglay O, Stafford J, Davis E, Young I, Fonseka R Brain Behav. 2023; 13(4):e2945.

PMID: 36912573 PMC: 10097165. DOI: 10.1002/brb3.2945.


Do after "not to do": Deinhibition in cognitive control.

Chen J, Cao B, Li F Mem Cognit. 2023; 51(6):1388-1403.

PMID: 36853480 DOI: 10.3758/s13421-023-01403-9.


Linking computational models of two core tasks of cognitive control.

Robinson M, Steyvers M Psychol Rev. 2022; 130(1):71-101.

PMID: 36227284 PMC: 10257386. DOI: 10.1037/rev0000395.


References
1.
Carter C, Braver T, Barch D, Botvinick M, Noll D, Cohen J . Anterior cingulate cortex, error detection, and the online monitoring of performance. Science. 1998; 280(5364):747-9. DOI: 10.1126/science.280.5364.747. View

2.
Ullsperger M, von Cramon D . Subprocesses of performance monitoring: a dissociation of error processing and response competition revealed by event-related fMRI and ERPs. Neuroimage. 2001; 14(6):1387-401. DOI: 10.1006/nimg.2001.0935. View

3.
Houghton G, Tipper S . Inhibitory mechanisms of neural and cognitive control: applications to selective attention and sequential action. Brain Cogn. 1996; 30(1):20-43. DOI: 10.1006/brcg.1996.0003. View

4.
Zeki S, Marini L . Three cortical stages of colour processing in the human brain. Brain. 1998; 121 ( Pt 9):1669-85. DOI: 10.1093/brain/121.9.1669. View

5.
Paus T . Primate anterior cingulate cortex: where motor control, drive and cognition interface. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001; 2(6):417-24. DOI: 10.1038/35077500. View