» Articles » PMID: 12381844

MAMMOTH (matching Molecular Models Obtained from Theory): an Automated Method for Model Comparison

Overview
Journal Protein Sci
Specialty Biochemistry
Date 2002 Oct 17
PMID 12381844
Citations 190
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Advances in structural genomics and protein structure prediction require the design of automatic, fast, objective, and well benchmarked methods capable of comparing and assessing the similarity of low-resolution three-dimensional structures, via experimental or theoretical approaches. Here, a new method for sequence-independent structural alignment is presented that allows comparison of an experimental protein structure with an arbitrary low-resolution protein tertiary model. The heuristic algorithm is given and then used to show that it can describe random structural alignments of proteins with different folds with good accuracy by an extreme value distribution. From this observation, a structural similarity score between two proteins or two different conformations of the same protein is derived from the likelihood of obtaining a given structural alignment by chance. The performance of the derived score is then compared with well established, consensus manual-based scores and data sets. We found that the new approach correlates better than other tools with the gold standard provided by a human evaluator. Timings indicate that the algorithm is fast enough for routine use with large databases of protein models. Overall, our results indicate that the new program (MAMMOTH) will be a good tool for protein structure comparisons in structural genomics applications. MAMMOTH is available from our web site at http://physbio.mssm.edu/~ortizg/.

Citing Articles

Impact of Alignments on the Accuracy of Protein Subcellular Localization Predictions.

Gillani M, Pollastri G Proteins. 2024; 93(3):745-759.

PMID: 39575640 PMC: 11809130. DOI: 10.1002/prot.26767.


GTalign: spatial index-driven protein structure alignment, superposition, and search.

Margelevicius M Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):7305.

PMID: 39181863 PMC: 11344802. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-51669-z.


LoCoHD: a metric for comparing local environments of proteins.

Fazekas Z, Menyhard D, Perczel A Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):4029.

PMID: 38740745 PMC: 11091161. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-48225-0.


Structome: a tool for the rapid assembly of datasets for structural phylogenetics.

Malik A, Langer D, Verma C, Poole A, Allison J Bioinform Adv. 2023; 3(1):vbad134.

PMID: 38046099 PMC: 10692761. DOI: 10.1093/bioadv/vbad134.


Computed Protein-Protein Enthalpy Signatures as a Tool for Identifying Conformation Sampling Problems.

Cinaroglu S, Biggin P J Chem Inf Model. 2023; 63(19):6095-6108.

PMID: 37759363 PMC: 10565830. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.3c01041.


References
1.
Murzin A . Structure classification-based assessment of CASP3 predictions for the fold recognition targets. Proteins. 1999; Suppl 3:88-103. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0134(1999)37:3+<88::aid-prot13>3.3.co;2-v. View

2.
Orengo C, Bray J, Hubbard T, LoConte L, Sillitoe I . Analysis and assessment of ab initio three-dimensional prediction, secondary structure, and contacts prediction. Proteins. 1999; Suppl 3:149-70. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0134(1999)37:3+<149::aid-prot20>3.3.co;2-8. View

3.
Leibowitz N, Nussinov R, Wolfson H . MUSTA--a general, efficient, automated method for multiple structure alignment and detection of common motifs: application to proteins. J Comput Biol. 2001; 8(2):93-121. DOI: 10.1089/106652701300312896. View

4.
Prestegard J, Valafar H, Glushka J, Tian F . Nuclear magnetic resonance in the era of structural genomics. Biochemistry. 2001; 40(30):8677-85. DOI: 10.1021/bi0102095. View

5.
Simons K, Bonneau R, Ruczinski I, Baker D . Ab initio protein structure prediction of CASP III targets using ROSETTA. Proteins. 1999; Suppl 3:171-6. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0134(1999)37:3+<171::aid-prot21>3.3.co;2-q. View