» Articles » PMID: 12372736

Comparative Study of MR Sialography and Digital Subtraction Sialography for Benign Salivary Gland Disorders

Overview
Specialty Neurology
Date 2002 Oct 10
PMID 12372736
Citations 24
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Purpose: MR sialography has become an alternative imaging technique for ductal salivary gland diseases. We compared the diagnostic accuracies of MR sialography and digital subtraction sialography in patients with successful completion of both examinations and benign salivary gland disorders.

Methods: In a prospective study, we attempted to examine salivary glands in 80 patients with clinically suspected diagnoses of sialadenitis and/or sialolithiasis. Each patient underwent digital subtraction sialography and MR sialography. MR sialography was obtained with a T2-weighted single-shot turbo spin-echo sequence (TR/TE 2800/1100 msec, acquisition time 7 seconds), with use of a quadrature head coil. Final diagnoses were confirmed by clinical follow-up and results of biopsy (n = 9) or surgery (n = 19).

Results: Failure rate was 5% (four of 80) for MR sialography and 14% (11 of 80) for digital subtraction sialography. Eighty-one salivary glands (48 parotid, 33 submandibular) in 65 patients were successfully visualized with both modalities. MR sialography depicted the main ductal system and first- and second-order branches, whereas digital subtraction sialography was able to depict third-order branches. Sensitivity and specificity to diagnose chronic sialadenitis were 70% and 98% with MR and 96% and 100% with digital subtraction sialography. MR sialography enabled diagnosis of sialolithiasis with a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 98% versus 90% and 98% for each with digital subtraction sialography.

Conclusion: MR sialography with a heavily T2-weighted sequence is highly successful in the noninvasive visualization of the ductal system of major salivary glands. It is useful for diagnosing sialolithiasis and sialadenitis. Digital subtraction sialography, an invasive technique, had a substantial procedural failure rate, particularly for the submandibular duct. However, because of its higher spatial resolution, successfully completed digital subtraction sialography achieved superior diagnostic information compared with that of MR sialography.

Citing Articles

A retrospective study of magnetic resonance sialography imaging applied in the prognostic evaluation of chronic obstructive parotitis.

Li Y, Pu Y, Shi H, Fan Q, Yu C Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2023; 13(10):6363-6373.

PMID: 37869301 PMC: 10585527. DOI: 10.21037/qims-22-1452.


A comparative study of three-dimensional cone-beam CT sialography and MR sialography for the detection of non-tumorous salivary pathologies.

Bertin H, Bonnet R, Le Thuaut A, Huon J, Corre P, Frampas E BMC Oral Health. 2023; 23(1):463.

PMID: 37420227 PMC: 10329379. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-023-03159-9.


A comparative study of three-dimensional cone beam computed tomographic sialography and ultrasonography in the detection of non-tumoral salivary duct diseases.

Cetinkaya V, Bonnet R, Le Thuaut A, Corre P, Mourrain-Langlois E, Delemazure-Chesneau A Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2023; 52(5):20220371.

PMID: 37052400 PMC: 10304847. DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20220371.


A Retrospective Clinical Trial Regarding Oral Rehabilitation Diagnosis Strategies Based on Stomatognathic System Pathology.

Lupu I, Checherita L, Antohe M, Stamatin O, Teslaru S, Hamburda T Biomedicines. 2023; 11(2).

PMID: 36831158 PMC: 9952906. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines11020622.


Sialography: a pictorial review.

Kandula S, Nagi R, Nagaraju R Oral Radiol. 2022; 39(2):225-234.

PMID: 36562930 DOI: 10.1007/s11282-022-00668-1.


References
1.
McGahan J, WALTER J, Bernstein L . Evaluation of the parotid gland. Comparison of sialography, non-contrast computed tomography, and CT sialography. Radiology. 1984; 152(2):453-8. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.152.2.6739814. View

2.
Varghese J, Thornton F, Lucey B, Walsh M, Farrell M, Lee M . A prospective comparative study of MR sialography and conventional sialography of salivary duct disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999; 173(6):1497-503. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.173.6.10584790. View

3.
Heverhagen J, Kalinowski M, Rehberg E, Klose K, Wagner H . Prospective comparison of magnetic resonance sialography and digital subtraction sialography. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2000; 11(5):518-24. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1522-2586(200005)11:5<518::aid-jmri7>3.0.co;2-5. View

4.
Yoshino N, Hosokawa A, Sasaki T, Yoshioka T . Interventional radiology for the non-surgical removal of sialoliths. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1996; 25(5):242-6. DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.25.5.9161177. View

5.
Fischbach R, Kugel H, Ernst S, Schroder U, Brochhagen H, Jungehulsing M . MR sialography: initial experience using a T2-weighted fast SE sequence. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1997; 21(5):826-30. DOI: 10.1097/00004728-199709000-00032. View