Digital Image Processing for Clinicians, Part III: SPECT Reconstruction

Overview

Journal J Nucl Cardiol

Specialty Cardiology & Vascular Diseases

Date 2002 Oct 3

PMID 12360135

Citations 8

Authors

Christopher L Hansen

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Citing Articles

Lung-to-heart ratio analysis using virtual planar images obtained from myocardial perfusion SPECT data: A phantom and clinical studies.

Imoto A, Tateishi E, Murakawa K, Ohta Y, Fukuda T J Nucl Cardiol. 2023; 30(5):1959-1967.

PMID: 36918459 DOI: 10.1007/s12350-023-03233-3.

Quality metrics for single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging: an ASNC information statement.

Hage F, Einstein A, Ananthasubramaniam K, Bourque J, Case J, DePuey E J Nucl Cardiol. 2023; 30(2):864-907.

PMID: 36607538 DOI: 10.1007/s12350-022-03162-7.

What is this image? 2019: Image 4 result : Starburst artifact from a remote intense hot spot creating perfusion defects in the LV myocardium on myocardial perfusion SPECT.

Qutbi M, Asli I J Nucl Cardiol. 2019; 27(1):15-17.

PMID: 31858423 DOI: 10.1007/s12350-019-01998-0.

Successful innovation: A time for change?.

Dendy J, Tilkemeier P J Nucl Cardiol. 2016; 24(1):134-137.

PMID: 27220878 DOI: 10.1007/s12350-016-0533-0.

Single photon-emission computed tomography.

Holly T, Abbott B, Al-Mallah M, Calnon D, Cohen M, DiFilippo F J Nucl Cardiol. 2010; 17(5):941-73.

PMID: 20552312 DOI: 10.1007/s12350-010-9246-y.

References

Hansen C . Digital image processing for clinicians, part I: Basics of image formation. J Nucl Cardiol. 2002; 9(3):343-9. DOI: 10.1067/mnc.2002.122897. View

Hansen C, Kramer M . Attenuation smear: a 'paradoxical' increase in counts due to attenuation artifact. Int J Card Imaging. 2001; 16(6):455-60. DOI: 10.1023/a:1010774426750. View

Liang Z, Jaszczak R, Greer K . On Bayesian image reconstruction from projections: uniform and nonuniform a priori source information. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1989; 8(3):227-35. DOI: 10.1109/42.34711. View

Tsui B, Gullberg G, Edgerton E, Ballard J, Perry J, McCartney W . Correction of nonuniform attenuation in cardiac SPECT imaging. J Nucl Med. 1989; 30(4):497-507. View

Hansen C, Siegel J . Attenuation correction of thallium SPECT using differential attenuation of thallium photons. J Nucl Med. 1992; 33(8):1574-7. View

Ranger N, Thompson C, Evans A . The application of a masked orbiting transmission source for attenuation correction in PET. J Nucl Med. 1989; 30(6):1056-68. View

Lange K, Carson R . EM reconstruction algorithms for emission and transmission tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1984; 8(2):306-16. View

Herman G, Meyer L . Algebraic reconstruction techniques can be made computationally efficient [positron emission tomography application]. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1993; 12(3):600-9. DOI: 10.1109/42.241889. View

Brooks R, DI CHIRO G . Theory of image reconstruction in computed tomography. Radiology. 1975; 117(3 Pt 1):561-72. DOI: 10.1148/117.3.561. View

10.

Ljungberg M, Strand S . Scatter and attenuation correction in SPECT using density maps and Monte Carlo simulated scatter functions. J Nucl Med. 1990; 31(9):1560-7. View

11.

Shepp L, Vardi Y . Maximum likelihood reconstruction for emission tomography. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1982; 1(2):113-22. DOI: 10.1109/TMI.1982.4307558. View

12.

Go R, MACINTYRE W, HOUSER T, Pantoja M, ODonnell J, Feiglin D . Clinical evaluation of 360 degrees and 180 degrees data sampling techniques for transaxial SPECT thallium-201 myocardial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Med. 1985; 26(7):695-706. View

13.

Levitan E, Herman G . A maximum a posteriori probability expectation maximization algorithm for image reconstruction in emission tomography. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1987; 6(3):185-92. DOI: 10.1109/TMI.1987.4307826. View

14.

Hansen C . Digital image processing for clinicians, part II: filtering. J Nucl Cardiol. 2002; 9(4):429-37. DOI: 10.1067/mnc.2002.122898. View

15.

Zubal I, Wisniewski G . Understanding Fourier space and filter selection. J Nucl Cardiol. 1997; 4(3):234-43. DOI: 10.1016/s1071-3581(97)90084-2. View

16.

Tamaki N, Mukai T, Ishii Y, Fujita T, Yamamoto K, Minato K . Comparative study of thallium emission myocardial tomography with 180 degrees and 360 degrees data collection. J Nucl Med. 1982; 23(8):661-6. View

17.

Hoffman E . 180 degrees compared with 360 degrees sampling in SPECT. J Nucl Med. 1982; 23(8):745-7. View

18.

Coleman R, Jaszczak R, COBB F . Comparison of 180 degrees and 360 degrees data collection in thallium-20 1 imaging using single-photon emission computerized tomography (SPECT): concise communication. J Nucl Med. 1982; 23(8):655-60. View