» Articles » PMID: 12355196

Differences in Leg Muscle Activity During Running and Cycling in Humans

Overview
Specialty Physiology
Date 2002 Oct 2
PMID 12355196
Citations 44
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Delta (delta) efficiency is defined as the ratio of an increment in the external mechanical power output to the increase in metabolic power required to produce it. The purpose of the present study was to investigate whether differences in leg muscle activity between running and cycling can explain the observed difference in delta efficiency between the two activities. A group of 11 subjects performed incremental submaximal running and cycling tests on successive days. The delta efficiencies during running and cycling were based on five exercise stages. Electromyograph (EMG) measurements were made of three leg muscles (gastrocnemius, vastus lateralis and biceps femoris). Kendall's correlation coefficients between the mean EMG activity and the load applied were calculated for each muscle, for both running and cycling. As expected, the mean delta efficiency during running (42%) was significantly greater than that during cycling (25%). For cycling, all muscles showed a significant correlation between mean EMG activity and the load applied. For running, however, only the gastrocnemius muscle showed a significant, but low correlation ( r=0.33). The correlation coefficients of the vastus lateralis and biceps femoris muscles were not significantly different from 0. The results were interpreted as follows. In contrast to cycling, which includes only concentric contractions, during running up inclines eccentric muscle actions play an important role. With steeper inclines, more concentric contractions must be produced to overcome the external force, whereas the amount of eccentric muscle actions decreases. This change in the relative contribution of concentric and eccentric muscle actions, in combination with the fact that eccentric muscle actions require much less metabolic energy than concentric contractions, can explain the difference between the running and cycling delta efficiency.

Citing Articles

Rating of Perceived Exertion: A Large Cross-Sectional Study Defining Intensity Levels for Individual Physical Activity Recommendations.

Grummt M, Hafermann L, Claussen L, Herrmann C, Wolfarth B Sports Med Open. 2024; 10(1):71.

PMID: 38856875 PMC: 11164849. DOI: 10.1186/s40798-024-00729-1.


Effects of Omega-3 Supplementation on the Delayed Onset Muscle Soreness after Cycling High Intensity Interval Training in Overweight or Obese Males.

Makaje N, Ruangthai R, Sae-Tan S J Sports Sci Med. 2024; 23(2):317-325.

PMID: 38841630 PMC: 11149071. DOI: 10.52082/jssm.2024.317.


Comparative efficacy of concurrent training types on lower limb strength and muscular hypertrophy: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Chen Y, Feng X, Huang L, Wang K, Mi J J Exerc Sci Fit. 2024; 22(1):86-96.

PMID: 38187085 PMC: 10767279. DOI: 10.1016/j.jesf.2023.12.005.


Perspectives on Concurrent Strength and Endurance Training in Healthy Adult Females: A Systematic Review.

Mikkonen R, Ihalainen J, Hackney A, Hakkinen K Sports Med. 2023; 54(3):673-696.

PMID: 37948036 PMC: 10978686. DOI: 10.1007/s40279-023-01955-5.


Effects of 16 weeks of two different high-protein diets with either resistance or concurrent training on body composition, muscular strength and performance, and markers of liver and kidney function in resistance-trained males.

Bagheri R, Kargarfard M, Sadeghi R, Scott D, Camera D J Int Soc Sports Nutr. 2023; 20(1):2236053.

PMID: 37516903 PMC: 10388821. DOI: 10.1080/15502783.2023.2236053.