» Articles » PMID: 12313950

The Nonmetropolitan Population Turnaround

Overview
Journal Annu Rev Sociol
Publisher Annual Reviews
Specialty Social Sciences
Date 1985 Jan 1
PMID 12313950
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

From 1970-1980, US nonmetropolitan areas grew more rapidly than previously, achieving overall a faster growth rate than metropolitan areas, with more migrants going from metropolitan to nonmetropolian areas than in the opposite direction. This paper reviews the literature that has emerged in seeking to understand this new trend, which was contrary to expectations and became known as the nonmetropolitan turnaround. Work includes macroanalyses of changes in nonmetropolitan settlement structure, changes in the distribution of employment, migration streams and differentials, as well as research on residential preferences and migration decison making. This is a new trend in terms of population distribution processes, although evidence that it reflects a greater importance of noneconomic factors in migration is mixed. Nonmetropolitan growth slowed in the latter part of the 1970s and overall the turnaround reversed in the early 1980s, but a return to a generally concentrated settlement pattern appears unlikely. The amount of research accomplished over a short span of time as a consequence of the turnaround is noteworthy, and the findings have contributed to increased understanding of US population change.

Citing Articles

DIFFERENTIAL RECOVERY MIGRATION ACROSS THE RURAL-URBAN GRADIENT: MINIMAL AND SHORT-TERM POPULATION GAINS FOR RURAL DISASTER-AFFECTED GULF COAST COUNTIES.

Curtis K, DeWaard J, Fussell E, Rosenfeld R Rural Sociol. 2021; 85(4):856-898.

PMID: 34121776 PMC: 8188854. DOI: 10.1111/ruso.12305.


Analyzing and interpreting spatial and temporal variability of the United States county population distributions using Taylor's law.

Xu M, Cohen J PLoS One. 2019; 14(12):e0226096.

PMID: 31825983 PMC: 6905577. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226096.


Can knowledge improve population forecasts at subcounty levels?.

Chi G Demography. 2011; 46(2):405-27.

PMID: 21305400 PMC: 2831277. DOI: 10.1353/dem.0.0059.


Housing growth in and near United States protected areas limits their conservation value.

Radeloff V, Stewart S, Hawbaker T, Gimmi U, Pidgeon A, Flather C Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010; 107(2):940-5.

PMID: 20080780 PMC: 2818924. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0911131107.


Population change and farm dependence: temporal and spatial variation in the U.S. Great Plains, 1900-2000.

White K Demography. 2008; 45(2):363-86.

PMID: 18613486 PMC: 2831362. DOI: 10.1353/dem.0.0010.