» Articles » PMID: 12296891

Morbidity and Mortality Associated with Pancreatogastrostomy and Pancreatojejunostomy Following Partial Pancreatoduodenectomy

Overview
Journal Br J Surg
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2002 Sep 26
PMID 12296891
Citations 45
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The pancreatic anastomosis is still the Achilles heel in partial pancreatoduodenectomy (PPD).

Methods: This study describes retrospectively a series of 441 patients who underwent standard or extended PPD and reconstruction by either pancreatogastrostomy or pancreatojejunostomy over a period of 13 years (1988-2000).

Results: Reconstruction of the pancreatic remnant was achieved by pancreatogastrostomy in 250 patients (56.7 per cent) and by pancreatojejunostomy in 191 patients (43.3 per cent). The leakage rate of the pancreatic anastomosis was 2.8 per cent after pancreatogastrostomy versus 12.6 per cent after pancreatojejunostomy (P < 0.001), whereas other surgical complications (bile leakage, haemorrhage, pancreatitis) were identical in the two groups. The leakage rate after standard PPD with or without vascular reconstruction was 2.0 per cent (four of 205 patients) after pancreatogastrostomy and 11.5 per cent (18 of 156) after pancreatojejunostomy (P < 0.001); following extended PPD it was 6.7 per cent (three of 45) after pancreatogastrostomy and 17.1 per cent (six of 35) after pancreatojejunostomy. The mortality rate due to leakage was 1.6 per cent (four of 250 patients) after pancreatogastrostomy versus 5.2 per cent (ten of 191) after pancreatojejunostomy (P = 0.037).

Conclusion: Pancreatogastrostomy is a safe and reliable method of reconstruction after PPD that may be associated with a lower leakage and mortality rate than pancreatojejunostomy.

Citing Articles

Management and outcomes of pseudoaneurysms presenting with late hemorrhage following pancreatic surgery: A six-year experience from a tertiary care center.

Rajendran J, Panwar R, Singh A, Dash N, Pal S, Srivastava D Indian J Gastroenterol. 2023; 42(3):361-369.

PMID: 37166698 DOI: 10.1007/s12664-023-01357-5.


[Endoscopic management of complications in the hepatobiliary and pancreatic system and the tracheobronchial tree].

Kouladouros K, Kahler G Chirurgie (Heidelb). 2022; 94(5):469-484.

PMID: 36269350 DOI: 10.1007/s00104-022-01735-3.


Comparison of Two Pancreatic Anastomosis Techniques in terms of Postoperative Complications After Pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Koc S, Dirican A, Soyer V, Ara C, Yologlu S, Yilmaz S Eurasian J Med. 2022; 53(3):192-196.

PMID: 35110095 PMC: 9879224. DOI: 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2021.20194.


Contemporary Surgical, Oncological, and Survival Outcomes of Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Periampullary Tumours: a 5-Year Experience from Tertiary Cancer Center.

Arjunan R, Karthik S, Chowdappa R, Althaf S, Srinivas C Indian J Surg Oncol. 2021; 12(3):603-610.

PMID: 34658591 PMC: 8490588. DOI: 10.1007/s13193-021-01385-7.


Completion pancreatectomy or a pancreas-preserving procedure during relaparotomy for pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy: a multicentre cohort study and meta-analysis.

Groen J, Smits F, Koole D, Besselink M, Busch O, den Dulk M Br J Surg. 2021; 108(11):1371-1379.

PMID: 34608941 PMC: 10364904. DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znab273.