» Articles » PMID: 12270018

Socioeconomic Differences Among Australian Adults in Consumption of Fruit and Vegetables and Intakes of Vitamins A, C and Folate

Overview
Journal J Hum Nutr Diet
Date 2002 Sep 25
PMID 12270018
Citations 24
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To determine whether socioeconomic groups differ in their food intakes for fruit and vegetables, their consumption of fruit and vegetables dense in vitamin A, folate and vitamin C, and their nutrient intakes of vitamin C, folate and vitamin A.

Methods: The 1995 Australian National Nutrition Survey collected food intake data from 8883 adults aged 18-64 years using a 24-h dietary recall. Fruit and vegetables were measured as amount (g) consumed. Intakes of nutrients were estimated from the 24-h dietary recall data. Participants were categorized by whether or not they consumed fruit or vegetables high in vitamin A, folate and vitamin C. Gross annual household income was used to measure socioeconomic position.

Results: Participants from low-income households consumed a smaller quantity of fruit and vegetables. They were also less likely to consume fruit and vegetables high in vitamin C, folate and vitamin A. Consistent with these findings, men and women from disadvantaged socioeconomic groups had lower intakes of vitamin C and folate compared with their more affluent counterparts. These differences were small to moderate in magnitude. Vitamin A intakes were not significantly related to income.

Conclusion: As well as promoting healthy dietary practices, nutrition-promotion strategies should target the nutrient intakes of lower socioeconomic groups. These programmes should focus on improving the quantity and choice of fruit and vegetables consumed by people from low-income households.

Citing Articles

Behavioral and Metabolic Risk Factors for Noncommunicable Diseases among Population in the Republic of Srpska (Bosnia and Herzegovina).

Majic A, Arsenovic D, cvokic D Healthcare (Basel). 2023; 11(4).

PMID: 36833017 PMC: 9957477. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11040483.


Tears for pears: Influence of children's neophobia on categorization performance and strategy in the food domain.

Foinant D, Lafraire J, Thibaut J Front Nutr. 2022; 9:951890.

PMID: 36211481 PMC: 9533737. DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2022.951890.


Behavioural change box? Applying the COM-B model to understand behavioural triggers that support consumption of fruits and vegetable among subscribers of a fruit and vegetable box scheme.

Craveiro D, Marques S, Bell R, Khan M, Godinho C, Peixeiro F Public Health Nutr. 2021; 24(18):6488-6498.

PMID: 34482856 PMC: 11374553. DOI: 10.1017/S1368980021003839.


Dietary inequity? A systematic scoping review of dietary intake in low socio-economic groups compared with high socio-economic groups in Australia.

Lewis M, Lee A Public Health Nutr. 2020; 24(3):393-411.

PMID: 32883404 PMC: 10195553. DOI: 10.1017/S1368980020003006.


Local level estimates of food, drink and tobacco expenditure for Great Britain.

James W, Lomax N, Birkin M Sci Data. 2019; 6(1):56.

PMID: 31086192 PMC: 6513822. DOI: 10.1038/s41597-019-0064-z.