» Articles » PMID: 12228575

Differential Solute Regulation in Leaf Blades of Various Ages in Salt-Sensitive Wheat and a Salt-Tolerant Wheat X Lophopyrum Elongatum (Host) A. Love Amphiploid

Overview
Journal Plant Physiol
Specialty Physiology
Date 1995 Aug 1
PMID 12228575
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Leaf blades of different ages from a salt-tolerant wheat x Lophopyrum elongatum (Host) A. Love (syn. Agropyron elongatum Host) amphiploid and its salt-sensitive wheat parent (Triticum aestivum L.cv Chinese Spring) were compared for their ionic relations, organic solute accumulation, and sap osmotic potential ([pi]sap). The plants were grown for 18 d in nonsaline (1.25 mM Na+) and salinized (200 mM NaCl) nutrient solutions. The response of leaf blades to NaCl salinity depended greatly on their age or position on the main stem. Na and proline levels were highest in the oldest leaf blade and progressively lower in younger ones. Glycine betaine and asparagine levels were highest in the youngest blade. The [pi]sap was similar for corresponding leaf blades of both genotypes, but contributions of various solutes to the difference in [pi]sap between blades from control and 200 mM NaCl treatments differed greatly. The NaCl-induced decline in [pi]sap of the youngest leaf blade of Chinese Spring was predominately due to the accumulation of Na and to a lesser extent asparagine; in the amphiploid, it was due to a combination of glycine betaine, K, Na, and asparagine. Proline contributed little in the youngest blade of either genotype. In the older blades Na was the major solute contributing to the decline in [pi]sap. Thus, the maintenance of low Na and high K levels and the accumulation of glycine betaine in the young leaf tissues contributed to the NaCl tolerance of the amphiploid. No such role was evident for proline.

Citing Articles

Proline and ROS: A Unified Mechanism in Plant Development and Stress Response?.

Renzetti M, Funck D, Trovato M Plants (Basel). 2025; 14(1.

PMID: 39795262 PMC: 11723217. DOI: 10.3390/plants14010002.


An ecotype-specific effect of osmopriming and melatonin during salt stress in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Juraniec M, Goormaghtigh E, Posmyk M, Verbruggen N BMC Plant Biol. 2024; 24(1):707.

PMID: 39054444 PMC: 11270801. DOI: 10.1186/s12870-024-05434-5.


Disomic Substitution of 3D Chromosome with Its Homoeologue 3E in Tetraploid Enhances Wheat Seedlings Tolerance to Salt Stress.

Zeng J, Zhou C, He Z, Wang Y, Xu L, Chen G Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(2).

PMID: 36675124 PMC: 9863149. DOI: 10.3390/ijms24021609.


Validation of a QTL on Chromosome 1DS Showing a Major Effect on Salt Tolerance in Winter Wheat.

Mohamed M, Siddiqui M, Oyiga B, Leon J, Ballvora A Int J Mol Sci. 2022; 23(22).

PMID: 36430224 PMC: 9691212. DOI: 10.3390/ijms232213745.


Salinity Stress in Potato: Understanding Physiological, Biochemical and Molecular Responses.

Chourasia K, Lal M, Tiwari R, Dev D, Kardile H, Patil V Life (Basel). 2021; 11(6).

PMID: 34200706 PMC: 8228783. DOI: 10.3390/life11060545.


References
1.
Fan T, Colmer T, Lane A, Higashi R . Determination of metabolites by 1H NMR and GC: analysis for organic osmolytes in crude tissue extracts. Anal Biochem. 1993; 214(1):260-71. DOI: 10.1006/abio.1993.1486. View

2.
Brunk D, Rich P, Rhodes D . Genotypic Variation for Glycinebetaine among Public Inbreds of Maize. Plant Physiol. 1989; 91(3):1122-5. PMC: 1062128. DOI: 10.1104/pp.91.3.1122. View

3.
Dietz K, Jager R, Kaiser G, Martinoia E . Amino Acid Transport across the Tonoplast of Vacuoles Isolated from Barley Mesophyll Protoplasts : Uptake of Alanine, Leucine, and Glutamine. Plant Physiol. 1990; 92(1):123-9. PMC: 1062257. DOI: 10.1104/pp.92.1.123. View

4.
Matoh T, Watanabe J, Takahashi E . Sodium, Potassium, Chloride, and Betaine Concentrations in Isolated Vacuoles from Salt-Grown Atriplex gmelini Leaves. Plant Physiol. 1987; 84(1):173-7. PMC: 1056547. DOI: 10.1104/pp.84.1.173. View

5.
Epstein E . The anomaly of silicon in plant biology. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994; 91(1):11-7. PMC: 42876. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.91.1.11. View