» Articles » PMID: 12222619

The Professional Status of Bioethics Consultation

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialty Medical Ethics
Date 2002 Sep 12
PMID 12222619
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Is bioethics consultation a profession? With few exceptions, the arguments and counterarguments about whether healthcare ethics consultation is a profession have ignored the historical and cultural development of professions in the United States, the ways social changes have altered the work and boundaries of all professions, and the professionalization theories that explain how modern societies institutionalize expertise in professions. This interdisciplinary analysis begins to fill this gap by framing the debate within a larger theoretical context heretofore missing from the bioethics literature. Specifically, the question of whether ethics consultation is a profession is examined from the perspectives of trait theory, Wilensky's five-stage process of professionalization, Abbott's interdependent system of professions, and Haug's deprofessionalization thesis. While healthcare ethics consultation does not meet the criteria to claim professional status, neither could most professions pass these ideal theoretical standards. Instead of a yes or no dichotomous response to the question, it is more helpful to envision a professionalization continuum with sales clerks or carpenters at one end and medicine or law at the other. During the past decade healthcare ethics consultation has been moving along this continuum toward greater professional status.

Citing Articles

Research Ethics Committees in Laboratory Medicine.

Beshir L EJIFCC. 2020; 31(4):282-291.

PMID: 33376468 PMC: 7745300.


The Ethics of Doing Ethics.

Hansson S Sci Eng Ethics. 2016; 23(1):105-120.

PMID: 26984874 DOI: 10.1007/s11948-016-9772-3.


Quality in ethics consultations.

Magill G Med Health Care Philos. 2013; 16(4):761-74.

PMID: 23709338 DOI: 10.1007/s11019-013-9489-x.


500 hats: exploring the challenges of boundary and community--reflections on professionalization.

Heesters A HEC Forum. 2012; 24(3):171-8.

PMID: 22886155 DOI: 10.1007/s10730-012-9190-0.


Not in isolation: how history can inform the debate on professionalization.

dAgincourt-Canning L HEC Forum. 2012; 24(3):165-70.

PMID: 22843338 DOI: 10.1007/s10730-012-9184-y.


References
1.
Yeo M . Prolegomena to any future code of ethics for bioethicists. Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 1993; 2(4):403-15. DOI: 10.1017/s0963180100004461. View

2.
Perkins H, Saathoff B . Impact of medical ethics consultations on physicians: an exploratory study. Am J Med. 1988; 85(6):761-5. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9343(88)80017-2. View

3.
Aulisio M, Arnold R, Youngner S . Health care ethics consultation: nature, goals, and competencies. A position paper from the Society for Health and Human Values-Society for Bioethics Consultation Task Force on Standards for Bioethics Consultation. Ann Intern Med. 2000; 133(1):59-69. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-133-1-200007040-00012. View

4.
La Puma J, Schiedermayer D . Ethics consultation: skills, roles, and training. Ann Intern Med. 1991; 114(2):155-60. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-114-2-155. View

5.
Hoffman D . Regulating ethics committees in health care institutions -- is it time?. MD Law Rev. 1991; 50(3):746-97. View