» Articles » PMID: 12219846

Assessment of Flatness and Symmetry of Megavoltage X-ray Beam with an Electronic Portal Imaging Device (EPID)

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2002 Sep 11
PMID 12219846
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The input/output characteristics of the Wellhofer BIS 710 electronic portal imaging device (EPID) have been investigated to establish its efficacy for periodic quality assurance (QA) applications. Calibration curves have been determined for the energy fluence incident on the detector versus the pixel values. The effect of the charge coupled device (CCD) camera sampling time and beam parameters (such as beam field size, dose rate, photon energy) on the calibration have been investigated for a region of interest (ROI) around the central beam axis. The results demonstrate that the pixel output is a linear function of the incident exposure, as expected for a video-based electronic portal imaging system. The field size effects of the BIS 710 are similar to that of an ion chamber for smaller field sizes up to 10 x 10 cm2. However, for larger field sizes the pixel value increases more rapidly. Furthermore, the system is slightly sensitive to dose rate and is also energy dependent The BIS 710 has been used in the current study to develop a QA procedure for measurements of flatness and symmetry of a linac x-ray beam. As a two-dimensional image of the radiation field is obtained from a single exposure of the BIS 710, a technique has been developed to calculate flatness and symmetry from a defined radiation area. The flatness and symmetry values obtained are different from those calculated conventionally from major axes only (inplane, crossplane). This demonstrates that the technique can pick up the "cold" and "hot" spots in the analysed area, providing thus more information about the radiation beam. When calibrated against the water tank measurements, the BIS 710 can be used as a secondary device to monitor the x-ray beam flatness and symmetry.

Citing Articles

Long-term performance monitoring of a-Si 1200 electronic portal imaging device for dosimetric applications.

Kutuzov I, Rivest R, VanUytven E, McCurdy B J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2024; 26(1):e14551.

PMID: 39374243 PMC: 11713653. DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14551.


Determination of the electronic portal imaging device pixel-sensitivity-map for quality assurance applications. Part 1: Comparison of methods.

Barnes M, Sun B, Oborn B, Lamichhane B, Szwec S, Schmidt M J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2022; 23(6):e13603.

PMID: 35429102 PMC: 9195035. DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13603.


An electronic portal image device (EPID)-based multiplatform rapid daily LINAC QA tool.

Ma Y, Wang X, Mai R, Wang T, Pei Y, Liu S J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2021; 22(1):45-58.

PMID: 33410254 PMC: 7856503. DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13055.


Evaluation of the TrueBeam machine performance check (MPC) beam constancy checks for flattened and flattening filter-free (FFF) photon beams.

Barnes M, Greer P J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2017; 18(1):139-150.

PMID: 28291921 PMC: 5689878. DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12016.


Evaluation of relative transmitted dose for a step and shoot head and neck intensity modulated radiation therapy using a scanning liquid ionization chamber electronic portal imaging device.

Mohammadi M, Bezak E J Med Phys. 2012; 37(1):14-26.

PMID: 22363108 PMC: 3283912. DOI: 10.4103/0971-6203.92716.