A Four-step Protocol for Limitation of Treatment in Terminal Care. An Observational Study in 475 Intensive Care Unit Patients
Overview
Affiliations
Objective: To describe a four-step protocol for withholding and withdrawal of life support (WH/WDLS) in intensive care unit (ICU) terminal patients.
Design: Observational study.
Setting: A 10-bed ICU of a general hospital.
Patients: Eighty-three patients out of 475 consecutive patients admitted over a 1 year period had WH/WDLS.
Interventions: The healthcare team chose a pattern of treatment limitation on a four-step protocol for every patient every day. There were four alternatives: group 1: no limitation of care; group 2: patient designated do not resuscitate (DNR) and pressors limited to dopamine at a maximum dose of 20 microg/kg per min; others therapies were continued; group 3: active withdrawal of all therapy except comfort care, i.e., the patient continued to receive nursing, sedation/analgesia, hydration and mechanical ventilation with FIO2=0.21 and no positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). Sedation was adjusted to Ramsay 3-4. The group 4 was treated the same as group 3 except that minute ventilation was 5 l/min and sedation/analgesia adjusted to Ramsay 6. WH/WDLS was performed only if the full ICU staff and all family members agreed with the procedure. WH/WDLS was documented in the patient's chart.
Results: Withholding and withdrawal of life support was performed in 83 patients (17%): 25 patients in group 2 (15 deaths), 36 patients in group 3 (36 deaths) and 22 patients in group 4 (22 deaths). Finally, 73 patients died after WH/WDLS. ICU stay was 10+/-17 days, time from admission to WH/WDLS was 184+407 h and time from WH/WDLS to death was 64+/-84 h.
Conclusion: This four-step protocol may promote medical decision making on end-of-life care.
Burns K, Cook D, Xu K, Dodek P, Villar J, Jones A Intensive Care Med. 2023; 49(10):1181-1190.
PMID: 37736783 DOI: 10.1007/s00134-023-07188-4.
Woznica-Niesobska E, Gozdzik W, Smiechowicz J, Strozecki L, Kubler A Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2020; 52(1):3-9.
PMID: 32090307 PMC: 10173140. DOI: 10.5114/ait.2020.92990.
A Time-to-Death Analysis of Older Adults after Emergency Department Intubation.
George N, Jambaulikar G, Sanders J, Ouchi K J Palliat Med. 2019; 23(3):401-405.
PMID: 31369301 PMC: 7133422. DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2018.0632.
Differences in level of care at the end of life according to race.
Johnson R, Newby L, Granger C, Cook W, Peterson E, Echols M Am J Crit Care. 2010; 19(4):335-43.
PMID: 20595215 PMC: 3766528. DOI: 10.4037/ajcc2010161.
End-of-life decisions in an Indian intensive care unit.
Mani R, Mandal A, Bal S, Javeri Y, Kumar R, Nama D Intensive Care Med. 2009; 35(10):1713-9.
PMID: 19568731 DOI: 10.1007/s00134-009-1561-x.