» Articles » PMID: 12200811

Osteocalcin and Myoglobin Removal in On-line Hemodiafiltration Versus Low- and High-flux Hemodialysis

Overview
Journal Am J Kidney Dis
Specialty Nephrology
Date 2002 Aug 30
PMID 12200811
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Removal of medium and large solutes is poor with low-flux (LF-HD) and limited with high-flux hemodialysis (HF-HD) and on-line hemodiafiltration (OL-HDF). In clinical practice, there are few in vivo solute markers. Osteocalcin is a protein with a molecular mass of 5,800 daltons, and myoglobin is a large molecule with a molecular mass of 17,200 daltons. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of OL-HDF on in vivo removal of a wide spectrum of solutes (urea, creatinine, osteocalcin, beta2-microglobulin, and myoglobin) in comparison to LF-HD and HF-HD.

Methods: Twenty-three patients (15 men, 8 women) were studied. Every patient underwent three dialysis sessions with routine HD parameters. We compared 1.8-m2 polysulfone LF-HD and 1.8-m2 polysulfone HF-HD versus OL-HDF. Predialysis and postdialysis solute concentrations were measured. The percentage of reduction ratio for each solute was calculated.

Results: Mean values for predialysis osteocalcin, beta2-microglobulin, and myoglobin were 16.3 +/- 21 ng/mL, 27.4 +/- 5 mg/L, and 239 +/- 162 ng/mL in LF-HD, respectively. Urea and creatinine reduction ratios were similar in LF-HD and HF-HD and only 1.2% higher in OL-HDF. Osteocalcin, beta2-microglobulin, and myoglobin reduction ratios for LF-HD were negligible. Mean osteocalcin reduction rates were 54.2% +/- 12% for HF-HD versus 63.5% +/- 9% for OL-HDF (reinfusion volume, 26.8 +/- 5 L/session; P < 0.01). Mean beta2-microglobulin reduction rates were 60.1% +/- 9% for HF-HD versus 75.4% +/- 9% for OL-HDF (P < 0.01). Mean myoglobin reduction rates were 24.5% +/- 6% and 62.7% +/- 9% for HF-HD and OL-HDF, respectively (P < 0.01).

Conclusion: LF-HD does not seem to remove solutes with a molecular weight greater than 5,800 daltons. OL-HDF provides marked enhancement of convection volume and enables a significant increase in osteocalcin and beta2-microglobulin removal. Myoglobin extraction is nil with LF-HD, very low with HF-HD, and only adequate with OL-HDF.

Citing Articles

Does online high-volume hemodiafiltration offer greater efficiency and sustainability compared with high-flux hemodialysis? A detailed simulation analysis anchored in real-world data.

Canaud B, Gagel A, Peters A, Maierhofer A, Stuard S Clin Kidney J. 2024; 17(6):sfae147.

PMID: 38903954 PMC: 11187497. DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfae147.


Management of Poisonings and Intoxications.

Ghannoum M, Roberts D Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2023; 18(9):1210-1221.

PMID: 37097121 PMC: 10564369. DOI: 10.2215/CJN.0000000000000057.


Hemodiafiltration: Technical and Medical Insights.

Lang T, Zawada A, Theis L, Braun J, Ottillinger B, Kopperschmidt P Bioengineering (Basel). 2023; 10(2).

PMID: 36829639 PMC: 9952158. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering10020145.


Combination of Multiple Hemodialysis Modes: Better Treatment Options for Patients Under Maintenance Hemodialysis.

Zhang Z, Li M, Yu H, Zhao J, Xiao F, Xuan F Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2021; 17:127-133.

PMID: 33542633 PMC: 7853439. DOI: 10.2147/TCRM.S288023.


The renal replacement therapy landscape in 2030: reducing the global cardiovascular burden in dialysis patients.

Canaud B, Collins A, Maddux F Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2020; 35(Suppl 2):ii51-ii57.

PMID: 32162663 PMC: 7066547. DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfaa005.