» Articles » PMID: 12199721

Effect of Electrical Stimulation of the Nucleus of the Solitary Tract on the Development of Electrical Amygdaloid Kindling in the Cat

Overview
Journal Epilepsia
Specialty Neurology
Date 2002 Aug 30
PMID 12199721
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: This work analyzed the effect of electrical stimulation of the nucleus of the solitary tract (NTS) on the development of electrical amygdaloid kindling (AK) in freely moving cats.

Methods: Nine male adult cats with implanted electrodes in both amygdalae (basolateral nucleus), both lateral geniculate bodies, left NTS, and both prefrontal cortices were used. Electromyogram and electrooculogram also were recorded. The AK was performed every 24 h (1-s train, 1-ms pulses, 60 Hz, 300-600 microA). The NTS was stimulated previously for 1 min (0.5-ms pulses, 30 Hz, 150-300 microA), just before the AK at 10:00 a.m., and then every 60 min, 4 times, from 11:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. On different days, all NTS stimulation was suspended, and AK was continued until stage VI kindling was reached.

Results: Behavioral changes produced by the stimulation of the NTS were blinking, immobility periods with upward sight, licking, and swallowing. Animals with simultaneous stimulation of NTS and AK did not reach stage VI, remaining in behavioral stages I-III. Stage VI was reached after NTS stimulation was intentionally suspended. The amplitude, duration, and the propagation of the amygdaloid afterdischarge did not exhibit progressive evolution during NTS stimulation. A regression analysis was performed between the number of days with only AK stimulation and days with simultaneous NTS stimulation, which showed a positive correlation (values of r = 0.84).

Conclusions: Our results suggest that NTS stimulation interferes with the development of convulsive evolution and secondary generalization. This delay effect may be due to the activation of the locus ceruleus and some areas of the midbrain reticular formation, among other structures, which has been demonstrated to inhibit experimental convulsive seizures.

Citing Articles

Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation Modulates the Prefrontal Cortex in Chronic Insomnia Patients: fMRI Study in the First Session.

He J, Jia B, Wang Y, Li S, Zhao B, Zhou Z Front Neurol. 2022; 13:827749.

PMID: 35401422 PMC: 8987020. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.827749.


The anatomical basis for transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation.

Butt M, Albusoda A, Farmer A, Aziz Q J Anat. 2019; 236(4):588-611.

PMID: 31742681 PMC: 7083568. DOI: 10.1111/joa.13122.


BOLD fMRI effects of transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation in patients with chronic tinnitus.

Yakunina N, Kim S, Nam E PLoS One. 2018; 13(11):e0207281.

PMID: 30485375 PMC: 6261575. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207281.


Epilepsy and Neuromodulation-Randomized Controlled Trials.

Kwon C, Ripa V, Al-Awar O, Panov F, Ghatan S, Jette N Brain Sci. 2018; 8(4).

PMID: 29670050 PMC: 5924405. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci8040069.


Innervation of the Human Cavum Conchae and Auditory Canal: Anatomical Basis for Transcutaneous Auricular Nerve Stimulation.

Bermejo P, Lopez M, Larraya I, Chamorro J, Cobo J, Ordonez S Biomed Res Int. 2017; 2017:7830919.

PMID: 28396871 PMC: 5371220. DOI: 10.1155/2017/7830919.