» Articles » PMID: 12177798

Heritable Breast Cancer in Twins

Overview
Journal Br J Cancer
Specialty Oncology
Date 2002 Aug 15
PMID 12177798
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Known major mutations such as BRCA1/2 and TP53 only cause a small proportion of heritable breast cancers. Co-dominant genes of lower penetrance that regulate hormones have been thought responsible for most others. Incident breast cancer cases in the identical (monozygotic) twins of representative cases reflect the entire range of pertinent alleles, whether acting singly or in combination. Having reported the rate in twins and other relatives of cases to be high and nearly constant over age, we now examine the descriptive and histological characteristics of the concordant and discordant breast cancers occurring in 2310 affected pairs of monozygotic and fraternal (dizygotic) twins in relation to conventional expectations and hypotheses. Like other first-degree relatives, dizygotic co-twins of breast cancer cases are at higher than usual risk (standardised incidence ratio (SIR)=1.7, CI=1.1-2.6), but the additional cases among monozygotic co-twins of cases are much more numerous, both before and after menopause (SIR=4.4, CI=3.6-5.6), than the 100% genetic identity would predict. Monozygotic co-twin diagnoses following early proband cancers also occur more rapidly than expected (within 5 years, SIR=20.0, CI=7.5-53.3). Cases in concordant pairs represent heritable disease and are significantly more likely to be oestrogen receptor-positive than those of comparable age from discordant pairs. The increase in risk to the monozygotic co-twins of cases cannot be attributed to the common environment, to factors that cumulate with age, or to any aggregate of single autosomal dominant mutations. The genotype more plausibly consists of multiple co-existing susceptibility alleles acting through heightened susceptibility to hormones and/or defective tumour suppression. The resultant class of disease accounts for a larger proportion of all breast cancers than previously thought, with a rather high overall penetrance. Some of the biological characteristics differ from those of breast cancer generally.

Citing Articles

Breast Cancer Polygenic Risk Score Validation and Effects of Variable Imputation.

Beck J, Slunecka J, Johnson B, Van Asselt A, Finnicum C, Ageton C Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(8).

PMID: 38672660 PMC: 11048743. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16081578.


E2F1 copy number variations in germline and breast cancer: a retrospective study of 222 Italian women.

Rocca M, Benna C, Goldin E, Di Nisio A, De Toni L, Cosci I Mol Med. 2021; 27(1):26.

PMID: 33691613 PMC: 7948349. DOI: 10.1186/s10020-021-00287-2.


Familial risks and estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer in Hong Kong Chinese women.

Tse L, Li M, Chan W, Kwok C, Leung S, Wu C PLoS One. 2015; 10(3):e0120741.

PMID: 25756203 PMC: 4355610. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0120741.


Most common 'sporadic' cancers have a significant germline genetic component.

Lu Y, Ek W, Whiteman D, Vaughan T, Spurdle A, Easton D Hum Mol Genet. 2014; 23(22):6112-8.

PMID: 24943595 PMC: 4271103. DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddu312.


The genetics of response to estrogen treatment.

Langdahl B Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab. 2012; 6(1):44-9.

PMID: 22461097 PMC: 2781219.


References
1.
Chen P, Sellers T, Rich S, Potter J, Folsom A . Segregation analysis of breast cancer in a population-based sample of postmenopausal probands: The Iowa Women's Health Study. Genet Epidemiol. 1995; 12(4):401-15. DOI: 10.1002/gepi.1370120408. View

2.
Hopper J, Southey M, Dite G, Jolley D, Giles G, McCredie M . Population-based estimate of the average age-specific cumulative risk of breast cancer for a defined set of protein-truncating mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2. Australian Breast Cancer Family Study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1999; 8(9):741-7. View

3.
Deapen D, Escalante A, Weinrib L, HORWITZ D, Bachman B, Roy-Burman P . A revised estimate of twin concordance in systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 1992; 35(3):311-8. DOI: 10.1002/art.1780350310. View

4.
Bishop D, Cannon-Albright L, McLellan T, GARDNER E, Skolnick M . Segregation and linkage analysis of nine Utah breast cancer pedigrees. Genet Epidemiol. 1988; 5(3):151-69. DOI: 10.1002/gepi.1370050303. View

5.
Mack T, Berkel J, Bernstein L, Mack W . Religion and cancer in Los Angeles County. Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1985; 69:235-45. View