The Effects of Control of Thermal Balance on Vascular Stability in Hemodialysis Patients: Results of the European Randomized Clinical Trial
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Background: Many reports note that the use of cool dialysate has a protective effect on blood pressure during hemodialysis (HD) treatments. However, formal clinical trials in which dialysate temperature is tailored to the body temperature of appropriately selected hypotension-prone patients are lacking.
Methods: We investigated the effect of thermal control of dialysate on hemodynamic stability in hypotension-prone patients selected from 27 centers in nine European countries. Patients were eligible for the study if they had symptomatic hypotensive episodes in 25% or more of their HD sessions, assessed during a prospective screening phase over 1 month. The study is designed as a randomized crossover trial with two phases and two treatment arms, each phase lasting 4 weeks. We used a device allowing the regulation of thermal balance (Blood Temperature Monitor; Fresenius Medical Care, Bad Homberg, Germany), by which we compared a procedure aimed at preventing any transfer of thermal energy between dialysate and extracorporeal blood (thermoneutral dialysis) with a procedure aimed at keeping body temperature unchanged (isothermic dialysis).
Results: One hundred sixteen HD patients were enrolled, and 95 patients completed the study. During thermoneutral dialysis (energy flow rate: DeltaE = -0.22 +/- 0.29 kJ/kg x h), 6 of 12 treatments (median) were complicated by hypotension, whereas during isothermic dialysis (energy flow rate: DeltaE = -0.90 +/- 0.35 kJ/kg x h), the median decreased to 3 of 12 treatments (P < 0.001). Systolic and diastolic blood pressures and heart rate were more stable during the latter procedure. Isothermic dialysis was well tolerated by patients.
Conclusion: Results show that active control of body temperature can significantly improve intradialytic tolerance in hypotension-prone patients.
Stuard S, Ridel C, Cioffi M, Trost-Rupnik A, Gurevich K, Bojic M J Clin Med. 2024; 13(11).
PMID: 38892922 PMC: 11173331. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13113211.
Canaud B, Davenport A, Leray-Moragues H, Morena-Carrere M, Cristol J, Kooman J Toxins (Basel). 2024; 16(5).
PMID: 38787063 PMC: 11125858. DOI: 10.3390/toxins16050211.
Technical requirements and devices available for long-term hemodialysis in children-mind the gap!.
Ranchin B, Peter Schmitt C, Warady B, Hataya H, Jones J, Lalji R Pediatr Nephrol. 2023; 39(9):2579-2591.
PMID: 38141144 DOI: 10.1007/s00467-023-06233-0.
Feedback control in hemodialysis.
Randhay A, Eldehni M, Selby N Semin Dial. 2023; 38(1):62-70.
PMID: 37994191 PMC: 11867153. DOI: 10.1111/sdi.13185.
Why is Intradialytic Hypotension the Commonest Complication of Outpatient Dialysis Treatments?.
Davenport A Kidney Int Rep. 2023; 8(3):405-418.
PMID: 36938081 PMC: 10014354. DOI: 10.1016/j.ekir.2022.10.031.