» Articles » PMID: 12124270

Determination of Cellular Strains by Combined Atomic Force Microscopy and Finite Element Modeling

Overview
Journal Biophys J
Publisher Cell Press
Specialty Biophysics
Date 2002 Jul 19
PMID 12124270
Citations 41
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Many organs adapt to their mechanical environment as a result of physiological change or disease. Cells are both the detectors and effectors of this process. Though many studies have been performed in vitro to investigate the mechanisms of detection and adaptation to mechanical strains, the cellular strains remain unknown and results from different stimulation techniques cannot be compared. By combining experimental determination of cell profiles and elasticities by atomic force microscopy with finite element modeling and computational fluid dynamics, we report the cellular strain distributions exerted by common whole-cell straining techniques and from micromanipulation techniques, hence enabling their comparison. Using data from our own analyses and experiments performed by others, we examine the threshold of activation for different signal transduction processes and the strain components that they may detect. We show that modulating cell elasticity, by increasing the F-actin content of the cytoskeleton, or cellular Poisson ratio are good strategies to resist fluid shear or hydrostatic pressure. We report that stray fluid flow in some substrate-stretch systems elicits significant cellular strains. In conclusion, this technique shows promise in furthering our understanding of the interplay among mechanical forces, strain detection, gene expression, and cellular adaptation in physiology and disease.

Citing Articles

The Diminishing Returns of Mechanical Loading and Potential Mechanisms that Desensitize Osteocytes.

Gardinier J Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2021; 19(4):436-443.

PMID: 34216359 PMC: 9306018. DOI: 10.1007/s11914-021-00693-9.


Stem Cell Mechanobiology and the Role of Biomaterials in Governing Mechanotransduction and Matrix Production for Tissue Regeneration.

Naqvi S, McNamara L Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020; 8:597661.

PMID: 33381498 PMC: 7767888. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.597661.


Anisotropy vs isotropy in living cell indentation with AFM.

Efremov Y, Velay-Lizancos M, Weaver C, Athamneh A, Zavattieri P, Suter D Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1):5757.

PMID: 30962474 PMC: 6453879. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-42077-1.


Probe Sensitivity to Cortical versus Intracellular Cytoskeletal Network Stiffness.

Vahabikashi A, Park C, Perkumas K, Zhang Z, Deurloo E, Wu H Biophys J. 2019; 116(3):518-529.

PMID: 30685055 PMC: 6369565. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2018.12.021.


Dehomogenized Elastic Properties of Heterogeneous Layered Materials in AFM Indentation Experiments.

Lee J, Rao S, Kaushik G, Azeloglu E, Costa K Biophys J. 2018; 114(11):2717-2731.

PMID: 29874620 PMC: 6129556. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2018.04.036.


References
1.
Jortikka M, Parkkinen J, Inkinen R, Karner J, Jarvelainen H, Nelimarkka L . The role of microtubules in the regulation of proteoglycan synthesis in chondrocytes under hydrostatic pressure. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2000; 374(2):172-80. DOI: 10.1006/abbi.1999.1543. View

2.
Ko K, McCulloch C . Partners in protection: interdependence of cytoskeleton and plasma membrane in adaptations to applied forces. J Membr Biol. 2000; 174(2):85-95. DOI: 10.1007/s002320001034. View

3.
Xu Q . Biomechanical-stress-induced signaling and gene expression in the development of arteriosclerosis. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2001; 10(1):35-41. DOI: 10.1016/s1050-1738(00)00042-6. View

4.
McAllister T, Frangos J . Steady and transient fluid shear stress stimulate NO release in osteoblasts through distinct biochemical pathways. J Bone Miner Res. 1999; 14(6):930-6. DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.1999.14.6.930. View

5.
Schaffer J, Rizen M, LItalien G, Benbrahim A, Megerman J, Gerstenfeld L . Device for the application of a dynamic biaxially uniform and isotropic strain to a flexible cell culture membrane. J Orthop Res. 1994; 12(5):709-19. DOI: 10.1002/jor.1100120514. View