» Articles » PMID: 12101193

Analysis of the Sensitivity of Death Certificates in 440 Hospital Deaths: a Comparison with Necropsy Findings

Overview
Journal J Clin Pathol
Specialty Pathology
Date 2002 Jul 9
PMID 12101193
Citations 38
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: There is current heightened public interest in issues surrounding death certification and necropsy. The present study was initiated to determine the accuracy of death certification in providing a correct diagnosis in a series of adult deaths occurring in hospital, all of which were followed by a necropsy.

Method: We examined a series of 440 consecutive adult hospital necropsies performed at Addenbrooke's Hospital, without prior knowledge of the cause of death on the death certificate. The major causes of death at necropsy were subdivided on the basis of organ systems and subsequently compared with the cause of death stated on the death certificate.

Results: There were 448 stated causes of death on the death certificates, compared with 508 causes recorded at necropsy. The overall sensitivity of the death certificate in predicting an individual cause of death was 0.47, with sensitivities ranging from 0.90 in the neurological system to 0.28 in the cardiovascular system, and the sensitivity for all malignant causes of death was 0.65. No significant overall differences were noted in respiratory, gastrointestinal, malignant, and "other" systems when comparing causes of death on the death certificate with those at necropsy.

Conclusions: There is a substantial discrepancy between the diagnosis given on death certificates compared with that at hospital necropsy. This paper discusses the importance of clinicopathological concordance and emphasises the importance of the necropsy in death certification.

Citing Articles

Autopsy of all young sudden death cases is important to increase survival in family members left behind.

Lynge T, Albert C, Basso C, Garcia R, Krahn A, Semsarian C Europace. 2024; 26(6).

PMID: 38715537 PMC: 11164113. DOI: 10.1093/europace/euae128.


The Use of Hospital Services by Patients With Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer in the Last Year of Life: Identifying the Areas to Improve Care.

Matson M, Tien T, Yardy G, Allchorne P, Green J Cureus. 2023; 15(11):e49175.

PMID: 38130562 PMC: 10734556. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.49175.


Discrepancies between clinical and autopsy findings in patients who had an acute stroke.

Hudak L, Nagy A, Molnar S, Mehes G, Nagy K, Olah L Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2022; 7(3):215-221.

PMID: 35101949 PMC: 9240455. DOI: 10.1136/svn-2021-001030.


Improving Validity of Cause of Death on Death Certificates.

Hoffman R, Venugopalan J, Qu L, Wu H, Wang M ACM BCB. 2020; 2018:178-183.

PMID: 32558825 PMC: 7302107. DOI: 10.1145/3233547.3233581.


Access to routinely collected health data for clinical trials - review of successful data requests to UK registries.

Lensen S, MacNair A, Love S, Yorke-Edwards V, Noor N, Martyn M Trials. 2020; 21(1):398.

PMID: 32398093 PMC: 7218527. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-020-04329-8.


References
1.
Laissue J, Altermatt H, Zurcher B, Truniger B, Gebbers J . [Significance of autopsy. Continuous evaluation of autopsy findings by internists]. Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1986; 116(5):130-4. View

2.
Kircher T, Nelson J, Burdo H . The autopsy as a measure of accuracy of the death certificate. N Engl J Med. 1985; 313(20):1263-9. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM198511143132005. View

3.
Mollo F, Bertoldo E, Grandi G, Cavallo F . Reliability of death certifications for different types of cancer. An autopsy survey. Pathol Res Pract. 1986; 181(4):442-7. DOI: 10.1016/S0344-0338(86)80080-2. View

4.
Campion E, Reder V, Mulley A, Thibault G . Age and the declining rate of autopsy. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1986; 34(12):865-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1986.tb07260.x. View

5.
ASHWORTH T . Inadequacy of death certification: proposal for change. J Clin Pathol. 1991; 44(4):265-8. PMC: 496895. DOI: 10.1136/jcp.44.4.265. View