» Articles » PMID: 12094990

Incorporating Multi-leaf Collimator Leaf Sequencing into Iterative IMRT Optimization

Overview
Journal Med Phys
Specialty Biophysics
Date 2002 Jul 4
PMID 12094990
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) treatment planning typically considers beam optimization and beam delivery as separate tasks. Following optimization, a multi-leaf collimator (MLC) or other beam delivery device is used to generate fluence patterns for patient treatment delivery. Due to limitations and characteristics of the MLC, the deliverable intensity distributions often differ from those produced by the optimizer, leading to differences between the delivered and the optimized doses. Objective function parameters are then adjusted empirically, and the plan is reoptimized to achieve a desired deliverable dose distribution. The resulting plan, though usually acceptable, may not be the best achievable. A method has been developed to incorporate the MLC restrictions into the optimization process. Our in-house IMRT system has been modified to include the calculation of the deliverable intensity into the optimizer. In this process, prior to dose calculation, the MLC leaf sequencer is used to convert intensities to dynamic MLC sequences, from which the deliverable intensities are then determined. All other optimization steps remain the same. To evaluate the effectiveness of deliverable-based optimization, 17 patient cases have been studied. Compared with standard optimization plus conversion to deliverable beams, deliverable-based optimization results show improved isodose coverage and a reduced dose to critical structures. Deliverable-based optimization results are close to the original nondeliverable optimization results, suggesting that IMRT can overcome the MLC limitations by adjusting individual beamlets. The use of deliverable-based optimization may reduce the need for empirical adjustment of objective function parameters and reoptimization of a plan to achieve desired results.

Citing Articles

Rapid direct aperture optimization via dose influence matrix based piecewise aperture dose model.

Zeng X, Gao H, Wei X PLoS One. 2018; 13(5):e0197926.

PMID: 29791505 PMC: 5965891. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197926.


Integral Dose-Based Inverse Optimization May Reduce Side Effects in Radiotherapy of Prostate Carcinoma.

Mihaylov I Front Oncol. 2017; 7:27.

PMID: 28299284 PMC: 5331038. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2017.00027.


An empirical method for automatic determination of maximum number of segments in DMPO-based IMRT for Head and Neck cases.

Ranganathan V, Maria Das K Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2016; 21(6):571-578.

PMID: 27721672 PMC: 5048111. DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2016.09.004.


New approach in lung cancer radiotherapy offers better normal tissue sparing.

Mihaylov I Radiother Oncol. 2016; 121(2):316-321.

PMID: 27692398 PMC: 5136503. DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.09.008.


Dose-mass inverse optimization for minimally moving thoracic lesions.

Mihaylov I, Moros E Phys Med Biol. 2015; 60(10):3927-37.

PMID: 25909516 PMC: 4426070. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/60/10/3927.