» Articles » PMID: 12088191

The Endoscopic Extraperitoneal Radical Prostatectomy (EERPE): Technique and Initial Experience

Overview
Journal World J Urol
Specialty Urology
Date 2002 Jun 29
PMID 12088191
Citations 38
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Using the experiences of the extraperitoneal (endoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy and inguinal hernia repair) and the transperitoneal approach (laparoscopic radical prostatectomy), we developed a totally extraperitoneal approach to endoscopic radical prostatectomy. In view of the favourable short-term outcome, we describe the technique of totally extraperitoneal endoscopic radical prostatectomy (EERPE) as a now standardised procedure. After creating the preperitoneal space by balloon dissection, five trocars were placed in the hypogastrium, allowing immediate access to the space of Retzius. The surgical technique of EERPE replicates the steps of the classical retropubic descending radical prostatectomy with slight modifications. The procedure starts with exposing the Retzius space and pelvic lymph node dissection. After that, the endopelvic fascia and the puboprostatic ligaments are incised, followed by ligating the Santorini plexus. The actual prostate dissection is similar to the open descending approach: bladder neck dissection, freeing of the seminal vesicles, transsectioning of the prostatic vesicles (with or without preserving the neurovascular bundles) and, finally, apical dissection. A water-tight urethrovesical anastomosis is performed with interrupted sutures. There were 20 patients who underwent EERPE. Mean operating time was 170 min with no conversion. No major complications occurred. Only one patient required a blood transfusion. The catheter could be removed on postoperative day 6 (n = 17) or on postoperative day 12 (n = 3). Final pathologic evaluations were 4 stage pT2a, 10 stage pT2b, 5 stage pT3a, and 1 pT3b. Surgical margins were negative in 17 patients. By avoiding entry into the peritoneal cavity, therefore, obviating intra-abdominal complications, such as bowel injury, ileus, or intestinal adhesions, the extraperitoneal endoscopic access provides a safe and minimally invasive approach to the prostate, combining the advantages of minimally invasive laparoscopy and retropubic open prostatectomy.

Citing Articles

A comparative evaluation of radical prostatectomy using laparoscopic and open method in view of surgical margins.

Wrona-Lis M, Wrona M, Madej A, Jakobczyk B, Rozanski W, Lipinski M Cent European J Urol. 2024; 76(4):300-304.

PMID: 38230315 PMC: 10789277. DOI: 10.5173/ceju.2023.77.


The development and assessment of a predicting nomogram for the recovery of immediate urinary continence following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Gu Z, Zheng Z, Zhang W, Mao S, Wang S, Geng J Front Surg. 2023; 9:1071093.

PMID: 36684134 PMC: 9852533. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1071093.


Van Velthoven single-knot running suture versus Chlosta's running suture versus single barbed suture V-Loc for vesicourethral anastomosis in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a retrospective comparative study.

Wiatr T, Belch L, Gronostaj K, Choragwicki D, Czech A, Curylo L Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2022; 17(1):214-225.

PMID: 35251409 PMC: 8886460. DOI: 10.5114/wiitm.2021.105851.


"Sandwich" Technique of Total Urethral Reconstruction in the Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: A Prospective Study.

Liu Y, Zhao Q, Yang F, Wang M, Xing N Cancer Manag Res. 2021; 13:2341-2347.

PMID: 33732026 PMC: 7959195. DOI: 10.2147/CMAR.S299367.


[Interactions between radical prostatovesiculectomy and diagnosis of prostate cancer : A medical-historical inventory on the occasion of 20 years of robot-assisted treatment].

Otto W, Wieland W Urologe A. 2020; 60(8):1039-1050.

PMID: 33201298 PMC: 7670839. DOI: 10.1007/s00120-020-01389-1.