Ethical Oversight of Public Health Research: Can Rules and IRBs Make a Difference in Developing Countries?

Overview

Journal Am J Public Health

Specialty Public Health

Date 2002 Jun 27

PMID 12084684

Citations 18

Authors

Leslie London

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Controversies in the conduct of international research continue to pose challenges for the system of ethical review, particularly for developing countries. Although the concept of vulnerability is key to addressing these challenges, ethical review has typically ignored the agency of vulnerable participants and groups in determining what kind of review process is needed. Concurrent with developments shaping the new public health that seek to operationalize empowerment of communities by placing them as initiators and organizers of their own health, ethical review of public health research must find ways to recognize the agency of vulnerable individuals, groups, and communities in the review process if it is to address effectively the ethical dilemmas currently evident in collaborative international research.

Citing Articles

Ethical Frameworks and Global Health: A Narrative Review of the "Leave No One Behind" Principle.

Oehring D, Gunasekera P Inquiry. 2024; 61:469580241288346.

PMID: 39385394 PMC: 11465308. DOI: 10.1177/00469580241288346.

Why research ethics should add retrospective review.

Dawson A, Lignou S, Siriwardhana C, OMathuna D BMC Med Ethics. 2019; 20(1):68.

PMID: 31597565 PMC: 6785872. DOI: 10.1186/s12910-019-0399-1.

Ethically Managing Risks in Global Health Fieldwork: Human Rights Ideals Confront Real World Challenges.

Hall-Clifford R, Cook-Deegan R Health Hum Rights. 2019; 21(1):7-18.

PMID: 31239610 PMC: 6586974.

A time for new north-south relationships in global health.

Kim J, Oleribe O, Njie R, Taylor-Robinson S Int J Gen Med. 2017; 10:401-408.

PMID: 29158688 PMC: 5683789. DOI: 10.2147/IJGM.S146475.

National Human Research Ethics: A Preliminary Comparative Case Study of Germany, Great Britain, Romania, and Sweden.

Gallagher B, Berman A, Bieganski J, Jones A, Foca L, Raikes B Ethics Behav. 2016; 26(7):586-606.

PMID: 27746664 PMC: 5044765. DOI: 10.1080/10508422.2015.1096207.

References

Greco D . Revising the declaration of Helsinki: ethics vs economics or the fallacy of urgency. Can HIV AIDS Policy Law Rev. 2002; 5(4):98-101. View

Emanuel E, Steiner D . Institutional conflict of interest. N Engl J Med. 1995; 332(4):262-7. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199501263320412. View

Benatar S . Reflections and recommendations on research ethics in developing countries. Soc Sci Med. 2002; 54(7):1131-41. DOI: 10.1016/s0277-9536(01)00327-6. View

Macpherson C . Research ethics committees: a regional approach. Theor Med Bioeth. 1999; 20(2):161-79. DOI: 10.1023/a:1009989104496. View

Benatar S . Distributive justice and clinical trials in the Third World. Theor Med Bioeth. 2001; 22(3):169-76. DOI: 10.1023/a:1011419820440. View

Rivera R, Ezcurra E . Composition and operation of selected research ethics review committees in Latin America. IRB. 2003; 23(5):9-12. View

Loewenson R . People centered science and globalization: putting the public back into public health policy. Int J Occup Environ Health. 1999; 5(1):65-71. DOI: 10.1179/oeh.1999.5.1.65. View

Schuklenk U . Protecting the vulnerable: testing times for clinical research ethics. Soc Sci Med. 2000; 51(6):969-77. DOI: 10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00075-7. View

Lurie P, Wolfe S . Unethical trials of interventions to reduce perinatal transmission of the human immunodeficiency virus in developing countries. N Engl J Med. 1997; 337(12):853-6. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199709183371212. View

10.

Brody B . Making informed consent meaningful. IRB. 2003; 23(5):1-5. View

11.

Varmus H, Satcher D . Ethical complexities of conducting research in developing countries. N Engl J Med. 1997; 337(14):1003-5. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199710023371411. View

12.

London A . The ambiguity and the exigency: clarifying 'standard of care' arguments in international research. J Med Philos. 2000; 25(4):379-97. DOI: 10.1076/0360-5310(200008)25:4;1-A;FT379. View

13.

Wolffers I, Adjei S, van der Drift R . Health research in the tropics. Lancet. 1998; 351(9116):1652-4. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)10237-9. View

14.

Krieger N . A glossary for social epidemiology. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2001; 55(10):693-700. PMC: 1731785. DOI: 10.1136/jech.55.10.693. View

15.

Kelch R . Maintaining the public trust in clinical research. N Engl J Med. 2002; 346(4):285-7. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM200201243460413. View

16.

Benatar S, Singer P . A new look at international research ethics. BMJ. 2000; 321(7264):824-6. PMC: 1118625. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.321.7264.824. View

17.

Mergler D . Worker participation in occupational health research: theory and practice. Int J Health Serv. 1987; 17(1):151-67. DOI: 10.2190/FPWF-C2ET-Q4DB-NMNQ. View

18.

Loue S, Okello D, Kawuma M . Research bioethics in the Ugandan context: a program summary. J Law Med Ethics. 1996; 24(1):47-53. DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.1996.tb01832.x. View

19.

Annas G . Questing for grails: duplicity, betrayal and self-deception in postmodern medical research. J Contemp Health Law Policy. 1996; 12(2):297-324. View

20.

Robertson A . Critical reflections on the politics of need: implications for public health. Soc Sci Med. 1998; 47(10):1419-30. DOI: 10.1016/s0277-9536(98)00255-x. View